1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lunna [17]
3 years ago
9

180 is the lcm of 12 and a number, N .What are the possible values of N ?

Mathematics
2 answers:
fomenos3 years ago
8 0
180 is the least common multiple of 12 and 45 or 90:

12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, <u>180</u>, 192, ...
45, 90, 135, <u>180</u>, 225, ...
90, <u>180</u>, 270, ...
7nadin3 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

45 ,90

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that LCM of 12 and  number  N is 180.

In order to find the number we will find the factors of 180 and 12

180=2\times 2\times 3\times 3\times 5

12=2\times 2\times 3

45=3\times 3\times 5

90=2\times 3\times 3\times 5

LCM(12,45)=2\times 2\times 3\times 3\times 5=180

LCM(12,90)=2\times 2\times 3\times 3\times 5=180

LCM of 12 and 45 is 180

LCM of 12 and 90 is 180.

Hence, possible of  N is 45 and 90.

You might be interested in
What’s the correct answer for this?
Nitella [24]

Answer:

6 pounds and .125 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Not sure if any of this is correct, but it’s what I got so far
Irina18 [472]

Problem 1 is correct. You use the pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse.

==================================================

Problem 2 has the correct answer, but one part of the steps is a bit strange. I agree with the 132 ft/sec portion; however, I'm not sure why you wrote \frac{1 \text{ sec}}{132 \text{ ft}}=\frac{0.59\overline{09}}{78 \text{ ft}}*127 \text{ ft}

I would write it as \frac{1\text{ sec}}{132 \text{ ft}}*127 \text{ ft} = \frac{127}{132} \text{ sec} \approx 0.96 \text{ sec}

==================================================

For problem 3, we first need to convert the runner's speed from mph to feet per second.

17.5 \text{ mph} = \frac{17.5 \text{ mi}}{1 \text{ hr}}*\frac{1 \text{ hr}}{60 \text{ min}}*\frac{1 \text{ min}}{60 \text{ sec}}*\frac{5280 \text{ ft}}{1 \text{ mi}} \approx 25.667 \text{ ft per sec}

Since the runner needs to travel 90-12 = 78 ft, this means\text{time} = \frac{\text{distance}}{\text{speed}} \approx \frac{78 \text{ ft}}{25.667 \text{ ft per sec}} \approx 3.039 \text{ sec}

So the runner needs about 3.039 seconds. In problem 2, you calculated that it takes about 0.96 seconds for the ball to go from home to second base. The runner will not beat the throw. The ball gets where it needs to go well before the runner arrives there too.

-------------

The question is now: how much of a lead does the runner need in order to beat the throw?

Well the runner needs to get to second base in under 0.96 seconds.

Let's calculate the distance based on that, and based on the speed we calculated earlier above.

\text{distance} = \text{rate}*\text{time} \approx (25.667 \text{ ft per sec})*(0.96 \text{ sec}) \approx 24.64032 \text{ ft}

This is the distance the runner can travel if the runner only has 0.96 seconds. So the lead needed is 90-24.64032 = 65.35968 feet

This is probably not reasonable considering it's well over halfway (because 65.35968/90 = 0.726 = 72.6%). If the runner is leading over halfway, then the runner is probably already in the running motion and not being stationary.

As you can see, the runner is very unlikely to steal second base. Though of course such events do happen in real life. What may explain this is the reaction time of the catcher may add on just enough time for the runner to steal second base. For this problem however, we aren't considering the reaction time. Also, not all catchers can throw the ball at 90 mph which is quite fast. According to quick research, the MLB says the average catcher speed is about 81.8 mph. This slower throwing speed may account for why stealing second base isn't literally impossible, although it's still fairly difficult.

5 0
3 years ago
Please help with this
GalinKa [24]
The answer is 20


Reason: so the W is 4 and the L is 6 so you do 4+4=8 then you do 6+6=12 then you add the two together and get 20
7 0
2 years ago
Solve the equation –2/3x = –12.
Ulleksa [173]

Answer: x = 18

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Prove that the value of the expression<br> (16^3–8^3)(4^3 +2^3) is divisible by 63.
Darya [45]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

16^3 - 8^3

Take out 8^3 as a common factor.

16^3 = 2^3 * 8^3

8^3(2^3 - 1)  

8^3(8 - 1) = 8^3 * 7

(4^3 + 2^3)     Expand

64 + 8            Combine

72

72 = 9 * 8

Conclusion

(8*3 * 7 )(9*8)

7*9 = 63

So any number containing 63 will divide into the reduced form of

(16^3–8^3)(4^3 +2^3)

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of z in the table? A 4% peroxide solution is mixed with a 10% peroxide solution, resulting in 100 L of an 8% s
    15·2 answers
  • On a very cold morning, it was -8°F. As the day went on, the temperature rose 2 degrees each hour. Which equation shows the temp
    15·2 answers
  • Express the product of 3/8 x 4/9 in simplest form
    10·1 answer
  • A jazz band sells 31 large boxes of fruit and 74 small boxes of fruit for a fundraiser.
    14·2 answers
  • Which variable is most important to the following problem?
    7·2 answers
  • How do I rewrite this expression in the form of k•y^n
    12·1 answer
  • What does it mean in geometry when they are putting segments over each other to show proportionality? In some video about triang
    9·1 answer
  • If the slope of a line and a point on the line are​ known, the equation of the line can be found using the​ slope-intercept form
    11·1 answer
  • Karen has a cube that has a side length of 6 in. The net of the cube is shown.
    11·1 answer
  • Simplify (x + y)² - (x - y)² + 2xy - 3x²​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!