The correct answer is C. Taiga hope it helps ( :
Answer:
I = I₀ + M(L/2)²
Explanation:
Given that the moment of inertia of a thin uniform rod of mass M and length L about an Axis perpendicular to the rod through its Centre is I₀.
The parallel axis theorem for moment of inertia states that the moment of inertia of a body about an axis passing through the centre of mass is equal to the sum of the moment of inertia of the body about an axis passing through the centre of mass and the product of mass and the square of the distance between the two axes.
The moment of inertia of the body about an axis passing through the centre of mass is given to be I₀
The distance between the two axes is L/2 (total length of the rod divided by 2
From the parallel axis theorem we have
I = I₀ + M(L/2)²
Explanation :
Dispersion forces are also known as London dispersion forces. It is the weakest force. Also, it is the part of the Van der Waals forces.
(1) This force is exhibited by all atoms and molecules.
(2) These forces are the result of the fluctuations in the electron distribution within molecules or atoms. Due to these fluctuations, the electric field is created. The magnitude of this force is explained in terms of Hamaker constant 'A'.
(3) Dispersion forces result from the formation of instantaneous dipoles in a molecule or atom. When electrons are more concentrated in a place, instantaneous dipoles formed.
(4) Dispersion force magnitude depends on the amount of surface area available for interactions. If the area increases, the size of the atom also increase. As a result, stronger dispersion forces.
So, the false statement is "Dispersion forces always have a greater magnitude in molecules with a greater molar mass".
Miguel Hidalgo was a Priest so I think it would be 1.
Hope I Helped ( :
