The correct answer is refers to civil court, not criminal court.
A civil court is one that deals with issues such as destruction of property. This is why the 7th amendment discusses how a person can bring any controversy to court in which the value of the item is greater than $20. On the other hand, criminal court deals with issues that involve actions such as violence or murder.
The key focus of the article is a rat called HeroRAT that was used to sniff out buried explosives in Cambodia. So the article is about Rats and Land Mines.
<h3>What did HeroRAT do?</h3>
HeroRat, also known as Magawa, is the name given to an African giant rat in Cambodia (which was six years old as of 2020) that was able to save many lives by detecting thirty-nine landmines.
It also detected over twenty-seven items in Cambodia that hadn't exploded. The correct answer, thus, is D.
See the link below to learn more about Rats and Land Mines:
brainly.com/question/26368251
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
