The Hubble Space Telescope is a joint ESA/NASA project and was launched in 1990 by the Space Shuttle mission STS-31 into a low-Earth orbit 569 km above the ground. During its lifetime Hubble has become one of the most important science projects ever. Hope this helps! ~ Autumn :)
Kinetic energy is never negative, but potential energy can be.
Potential energy depends on height above some reference level,
and you can pick any level you want as the reference. So, if the
object is below the reference level you pick, then its potential
energy relative to your reference level is negative.
What that means is: You have to lift it / do work on it / give it more
energy than it has now ... in order to move it to the reference level.
(That's exactly the situation with electrons bound to an atom. Their
energy is considered negative, because we have to do work and
give them more energy to rip them away from the atom.)
_____________________________________
Regarding the other choices:
-- Kinetic energy is scalar ... Yes. So is potential energy.
-- Kinetic energy increases with height ...
No. It doesn't, but potential energy does.
-- Kinetic energy depends on position ...
No. It doesn't, but potential energy does.
Answer:
a
b
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The pressure of the water in the pipe is 
The speed of the water is 
The original area of the pipe is 
The new area of the pipe is ![A_2 = \pi * \frac{[\frac{d}{2} ]^2}{4} = \pi * \frac{\frac{d^2}{4} }{4} = \pi \frac{d^2}{16}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A_2%20%3D%20%5Cpi%20%2A%20%20%5Cfrac%7B%5B%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7B2%7D%20%5D%5E2%7D%7B4%7D%20%20%3D%20%20%5Cpi%20%2A%20%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cfrac%7Bd%5E2%7D%7B4%7D%20%7D%7B4%7D%20%3D%20%5Cpi%20%5Cfrac%7Bd%5E2%7D%7B16%7D)
Generally the continuity equation is mathematically represented as
Here 
is the new velocity
So
=> 
=> 
=> 
=>
Generally given that the height of the original pipe and the narrower pipe are the same , then we will b making use of the Bernoulli's equation for constant height to calculate the pressure
This is mathematically represented as
Here 
is the density of water with value 
![P_2 = P_1 + \frac{1}{2} * \rho [ v_1^2 - v_2^2 ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_2%20%3D%20%20P_1%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%2A%20%20%5Crho%20%5B%20v_1%5E2%20-%20v_2%5E2%20%5D)
=> ![P_2 = 110 *10^{3} + \frac{1}{2} * 1000 * [ 1.4 ^2 - 5.6 ^2 ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_2%20%3D%20%20110%20%2A10%5E%7B3%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%2A%20%201000%20%2A%20%20%5B%201.4%20%5E2%20-%205.6%20%5E2%20%5D)
=>
The only thing we know of so far that can shift light to longer wavelengths is the "Doppler" effect. If the source and the observer are moving apart, then the observer sees wavelengths that are longer than they should be. If the source and the observer are moving toward each other, then the observer sees wavelengths that are shorter than they should be. It works for ANY wave ... sound, light, water etc. The trick is to know what the wavelength SHOULD be. If you know that, then you can tell whether you and the source are moving together or apart, and you can even tell how fast. If the lines in a star"s spectrum are at wavelengths that are too long, then from everything we know right now, the star and Earth are moving apart.
