1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ELEN [110]
3 years ago
11

slader The magnitude of earthquakes recorded in a region of North America can be modeled ashaving an exponential distribution wi

th mean 2.4, as measured on the Richter scale. Find theprobability that an earthquake striking this region will a exceed 3.0 on the Richter scale. b fall between 2.0 and 3.0 on the Richter scale.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a) P(X>3.0)=1-P(X \leq 3.0)= 1- [1- e^{-\frac{1}{2.4} 3.0}]=e^{-\frac{1}{2.4} 3.0}=0.287

b) P(2

P(2

Step-by-step explanation:

Definitions and concepts

The Poisson process is useful when we want to analyze the probability of ocurrence of an event in a time specified. The probability distribution for a random variable X following the Poisson distribution is given by:

P(X=x) =\lambda^x \frac{e^{-\lambda}}{x!}

And the parameter \lambda represent the average ocurrence rate per unit of time.

The exponential distribution is useful when we want to describ the waiting time between Poisson occurrences. If we assume that the random variable T represent the waiting time btween two consecutive event, we can define the probability that 0 events occurs between the start and a time t, like this:

P(X>x)= e^{-\lambda x}

We can express in terms of the mean \mu =\frac{1}{\lambda}

P(X>x)= e^{-\frac{1}{\mu} x}

And the cumulative function would be given by the complement rule like this:

P(X\leq x)=1- e^{-\frac{1}{\mu} x}

Solution for the problem

For this case we have that X the random variable that represent the magnitude of earthquakes recorded in a region of North America, we know that the distribution is given by:

X\sim Expon(\mu =2.4)

a) Find theprobability that an earthquake striking this region will a exceed 3.0 on the Richter scale

So for this case we want this probability:

P(X>3.0)=1-P(X \leq 3.0)= 1- [1- e^{-\frac{1}{2.4} 3.0}]=e^{-\frac{1}{2.4} 3.0}=0.287

b) fall between 2.0 and 3.0 on the Richter scale.

For this case we want this probability:

P(2 < X

And replacing we have this:

P(2

P(2

You might be interested in
How do you write 5 times the sum of D and 4
Law Incorporation [45]
5(d+4) would be the correct answer.

4 0
3 years ago
li making beaded necklaces. For each necklaces,she uses 27 spacers plus 5 beads per inch necklaces lenght. Write an equation to
Lana71 [14]
I think it is x= 27+5y
4 0
3 years ago
Help please...whats an explicit equation?
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
We represent a sequence with a formula that lets us find any term in the sequence without knowing any other terms, we are representing the sequence explicitly.
4 0
3 years ago
Please answer this correctly which is the correct options
MakcuM [25]

The first two are equivalent to 15 = k + 13

8 = k + 13 - 7 → ( add 7 to both sides )

8 + 7 = k + 13 ⇒ 15 = k + 13 ' is equivalent '

12 = k + 13 - 3 → ( add 3 to both sides )

12 + 3 = k + 13 ' is equivalent '


4 0
3 years ago
Identify the horizontal asymptote of f(x) = quantity 2 x minus 1 over quantity x squared minus 7 x plus 3.
Rina8888 [55]
We must recall that a horizontal asymptote is the value/s of y that the given function approaches to but never reaches. To find this in a rational function, we compare the expressions with highest degree in the numerator and denominator. There are three possible outcome when this happens.

1. if the highest degree (highest exponent) in the numerator is bigger than that of the denominator, then there won't be any horizontal asymptote.

2. if the highest degree in the denominator is bigger, then the horizontal symptote would be y = 0.

3. if they have the same highest degree, then we just get the quotient of their coefficient. 

Now, going back to our function, we have

f(x) = \frac{2x - 1}{x^{2} - 7x + 3}

From this we can see that the highest degree in the numerator is 1 (from 2x) and 2 (from x²) for the denominator. Clearly, it shows that its denominator has a higher degree. And from our discussion, we can conclude that the horizontal asymptote would be y = 0.

Answer: y = 0
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help with a problem help pls
    7·2 answers
  • Does doubling the height of the cylinder has the same affect on the volume of a cylinder as doubling the radius explain
    13·1 answer
  • Let f(x) = x 7 and g(x) = x − 4. find f(x) ⋅ g(x).
    8·2 answers
  • How is the converse formed
    9·1 answer
  • a segment has a midpoint (-2,9) and one endpoint (2,8). what is the x coordinate of the other endpoint?
    7·1 answer
  • For which independent value do the equations generate the same dependent value? y1 = 6x + 10 Y2 = 4x+4
    11·1 answer
  • The isosceles triangle shown has a height of 7 meters and base
    15·1 answer
  • If, f(x) = x^2 + 3x -2, then f(a + 1) =<br><br> I hate homework
    6·1 answer
  • A recipe for cookie dough calls for three and two third cups of flour. Jane only ha 1 and three fourth cups of flour. How many m
    15·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7B2%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%5Ctimes%20%20%7B2%7D%5E%7B3%7D%20%20%20%5Cdiv%20%20%7B2%7D%5E%7B4%7
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!