A wave with low energy will also have

Three ideal polarizing filters are stacked, with the polarizing axis of the second and third filters at 21 degrees and 61 degree

kvv77 [185]

Answer:

1

When second polarizer is removed the intensity after it passes through the stack is

$I_f_3 = 27.57 W/cm^2$

2 When third polarizer is removed the intensity after it passes through the stack is

$I_f_2 = 102.24 W/cm^2$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The angle of the second polarizing to the first is $\theta_2 = 21^o$

The angle of the third polarizing to the first is $\theta_3 = 61^o$

The unpolarized light after it pass through the polarizing stack $I_u = 60 W/cm^2$

Let the initial intensity of the beam of light before polarization be $I_p$

Generally when the unpolarized light passes through the first polarizing filter the intensity of light that emerges is mathematically evaluated as

$I_1 = \frac{I_p}{2}$

Now according to Malus’ law the intensity of light that would emerge from the second polarizing filter is mathematically represented as

$I_2 = I_1 cos^2 \theta_1$

$= \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_1$

The intensity of light that will emerge from the third filter is mathematically represented as

$I_3 = I_2 cos^2(\theta_2 - \theta_1 )$

$I_3= \frac{I_p}{2}(cos^2 \theta_1)[cos^2(\theta_2 - \theta_1)]$

making $I_p$ the subject of the formula

$I_p = \frac{2L_3}{(cos^2 \theta [cos^2 (\theta_2 - \theta_1)])}$

Note that $I_u = I_3$ as $I_3$ is the last emerging intensity of light after it has pass through the polarizing stack

Substituting values

$I_p = \frac{2 * 60 }{(cos^2(21) [cos^2 (61-21)])}$

$I_p = \frac{2 * 60 }{(cos^2(21) [cos^2 (40)])}$

$=234.622W/cm^2$

When the second is removed the third polarizer becomes the second and final polarizer so the intensity of light would be mathematically evaluated as

$I_f_3 = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_2$

$I_f_3$ is the intensity of the light emerging from the stack

substituting values

$I_f_3 = \frac{234.622}{2} * cos^2(61)$

$I_f_3 = 27.57 W/cm^2$

When the third polarizer is removed the second polarizer becomes the

the final polarizer and the intensity of light emerging from the stack would be

$I_f_2 = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_1$

$I_f_2$ is the intensity of the light emerging from the stack

Substituting values

$I_f_2 = \frac{234.622}{2} cos^2 (21)$

$I_f_2 = 102.24 W/cm^2$

7 0

3 years ago

How is ozone formed?

frosja888 [35]

When energetic UV rays dissociates molecules of oxygen into seperate atoms. But when they collide into each other it forms OZONE.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Starting from rest, a dragster travels a straight 1/4 mi racetrack in 7.10 s with constant acceleration. What is its velocity wh

Gennadij [26K]

268.6567 mph is its velocity when it crosses the finish line

d=(v1+v2 /2) x t

.25=(0+v2 /2) x 6.7/3600 hours

900=v2/2 x 6.7

v2=268.6567 mph as the speed with which the dragster crosses the finish

<h3>When acceleration is not zero, can speed remain constant?</h3>

The answer is that an accelerated motion can have a constant speed. Consider a particle travelling uniformly around a circle; it experiences acceleration since the motion's direction is changing, but it maintains a constant speed along the tangential axis throughout the motion.

Acceleration is the frequency of a change in velocity. Acceleration is a vector with magnitude and direction, much as velocity. For instance, if a car is moving in a straight path and speeding up, it is said to have forward (positive) acceleration, and if it is slowing down, it is said to have backward (negative) acceleration.

Learn more about velocity refer

brainly.com/question/24681896

#SPJ9

5 0

1 year ago

A mass m = 3.9 kg hangs from a massless string wrapped around a uniform cylinder with mass Mp = 10.53 and radius R= 0.96 m. The

luda_lava [24]

Answer:

the rotational inertia of the cylinder = 4.85 kgm²

the mass moved 7.942 m/s

Explanation:

Formula for calculating Inertia can be expressed as: