Answer:
1,352.32
Step-by-step explanation:
If you take 7.6 and multiply it to 16,412.05 (.076)(16,412.05), you get 1,247.32. You then add the overhead cost of 105 to get 1352.32. (Apex verified too)
Answer:
A yard sale.
Step-by-step explanation:
lol
The first one 7/2 represents the change in y over change in x.
For those kinds of questions I would refer to the change in y over change in x method.
Bullet 3 would work because 7/2 doesn’t result to 1. So that’s not the answer.
I hope that helps
Answer:
Check Explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The sample will be a representative of the entire build us in the city.
For a sample size 35, 3 have fire code violations, hence, the proportion of houses with fire code violations = (3/35) = 0.0857 = 8.57 %
The uncertainty in the estimate is given in the form of standard error.
Standard error = √[(p(1-p)/n]
n = sample size = 35, p = 0.0857, 1 - p = 0.9143
Standard error of the sample = √(0.0857×0.9143/35) = 0.1616
In terms of the population, (0.1616/35) = 0.00462
Proportion of buildings with fire code violations = (8.57 ± 0.462) %
