Yes this is not correct br
<span>You are given the following statistics showing how many points each player scores on average and how many points the team scores in a game when the player is not playing.
Player A PPG: 25 Team Points
when the player is absent: 100
Player B PPG: 24 Team Points
when the player is absent: 80
Player C PPG: 20 Team Points
when the player is absent: 84
Player D PPG: 19 Team Points
when the player is absent: 87
Player E PPG: 13 Team Points
when the player is absent: 50
Player F PPG: 5 Team Points
when the player is absent: 99
Player G PPG: 5 Team Points
when the player is absent: 90
(1) The player that is most helpful to the team is Player A. When player A is playing,he can garner 25 points and when he is not around, the team loses 100 points.
(2) The player that is the most altruistic (helpful to others) is Player E. Even if he can just gain 13 points when playing, when he is not around, their lost is just 50 points.
(3) The order from increasing to the least is player A, B, D, C, E, G, F.</span>
Is that the Algebra work/practice book? If so, go into algebra nation and they have videos where they go step by step through the questions. Hope this helps?
The answer is B. 97
3 x 27 + 2 x 8
<h2>
Answer with explanation:</h2>
By considering the given information, we have
Null hypothesis : 
Alternative hypothesis : 
Since the alternative hypothesis is two-tailed , so the test is a two-tailed test.
Given : Sample size : n= 20, since sample size is less than 30 so the test applied is a t-test.
; 
Test statistic : 
i.e. 
Degree of freedom : n-1 = 20-1=19
Significance level = 0.01
For two tailed, Significance level 
By using the t-distribution table, the critical value of t =
Since , the observed t-value (7.25) is greater than the critical value (2.861) .
So we reject the null hypothesis, it means we have enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
We conclude that there is some significance difference between the mean score for sober women and 35.0.
