It seems more and more there are fewer conservation organizations who speak for the forest, and more that speak for the timber industry. Witness several recent commentaries in Oregon papers that are by no means unique. I’ve seen similar themes from other conservation groups across the West in recent years.
Many conservation groups have uncritically adopted views that support more logging of our public lands based upon increasingly disputed ideas about forest health and fire ecology, as well as the age-old bias against natural processes like wildfire and beetles.
For instance, an article in the Portland Oregonian quotes Oregon Wild’s executive director Sean Stevens bemoaning the closure of a timber mill in John Day Oregon. Stevens said: “Loss of the 29-year-old Malheur Lumber Co. mill would be ‘a sad turn of events’” Surprisingly, Oregon Wild is readily supporting federal subsidies to promote more logging on the Malheur National Forest to sustain the mill.
Hi!
I think the oxidation state of all the atoms should change. :)
Hope this helps
Answer:
6 electrons
Explanation:
The p orbital can hold up to six electrons. We'll put six in the 2p orbital and then put the next two electrons in the 3s.
<span>a. x and y are atoms of the same element.
If both atoms contain the same amount of protons, they are always the same element.
</span>
Answer:
The answer is 1.61 × 10²³ atoms
Explanation:
To determine number of atoms, we will use the formula below
Number of atoms = number of moles (n) × avogadro's constant (6.02 x 10²³)
n was not provided, hence we will solve for n
n = mass/ molar mass
molar mass of carbon monoxide, CO (where C is 12 and O is 16) is 12 + 16 = 28
mass was provided in the question as 7.48
n = 7.48/28
n = 0.267
Hence,
number of atoms = 0.267 × 6.02 x 10²³
= 1.61 × 10²³ atoms
