Answer:
The first 3
Step-by-step explanation:
If this helped you please rate this comment, give it a like, and maybe mark it as branliest!
Answer:
2(6e-3f+10g)
Answer (I think): 12e-6f+20g
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer: Choice C) 31</h3>
==============================================
Explanation:
The recursive rule
f(n+1)=f(n)-3
can be rearranged to
f(n) = f(n+1)+3
after adding 3 to both sides
----------------
Now let's say we plug in n = 3
f(n) = f(n+1)+3
f(3) = f(3+1)+3
f(3) = f(4)+3
f(3) = 22+3
f(3) = 25
Repeat for n = 2
f(n) = f(n+1)+3
f(2) = f(2+1)+3
f(2) = f(3)+3
f(2) = 25+3
f(2) = 28
Each time we keep adding 3 to get the previous term (since the original recursive rule says to subtract 3 to get the next term; we just go backwards of what the instructions say).
Lastly, we can find that f(1) = f(2)+3 = 28+3 = 31 making the answer to be choice C.
Answer:
Proportion of buildings in the city that have fire code violations: 10%
Uncertainty 0.3 = 30%
Step-by-step explanation:
This situation complies with a binomial model where p is the probability of finding a building having fire code violations and q=1-p
Since in random sample of 40 buildings chosen for inspection 4 of them are found to have fire code violations, the proportion is 4/40 = 0.1 or 10% and p=0.1 as well.
<em>In a</em> <em>binomial model the standard deviation s is:
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>where n is the sample size</em>. So
and the uncertainty is the standard error SE
