1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
3 years ago
11

Your friend says, “chemical changes are caused by an input in energy. In physical changes, there is no transfer of energy” is yo

ur friend correct? Why or why not?
Physics
1 answer:
nalin [4]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Ok, let's suppose the simplest of the physical changes:

We have an object that is not moving (so it is not accelerated)

and there is change, now the object moves.

Because there was a change, means that there was an acceleration, and by the second Newton's law.

Force equals mass times acceleration:

F = m*a

There must be a force.

So suppose that you pushed the object, then some energy that you had, you transferred it to the object, that now is moving and now has kinetic energy.

Now, is kinda true that in a closed system the total energy is always constant, but it depends on what is our system.

So if we think in our system as you and the object, then in the whole system the energy does not change because the energy that you lost is now on the object, but again, there was a transfer of energy.

So no, your friend is not correct.

You might be interested in
Several large firecrackers are inserted into the holes of a bowling ball, and the 6.3 kg ball is then launched into the air with
Anni [7]

Answer

given,

mass of the ball = 6.3 kg

speed of the ball = 10.4 m/s

angle made with horizontal = 43°

m_a = 1.8 kg               v_a = 2.2 m/s

m_b = 1.6 kg               v_b = 1.8 m/s

mass of third particle = 6.3 - 1.8 - 1.6

                                   = 2.9 kg

u cos θ = 10.4 x cos 43° = 7.61 m/s

by using conservation momentum along x-axis

6.3 x 7.61 = 1.8 × (-2.2) + 0 + 1.6 × V₃ₓ

V₃ₓ = 32.44 m/s (toward right)

by using conservation momentum along y-axis

0 = 0 + 1.6 x 1.8 + 1.6 × V₃y

V₃y = -1.8 m/s (indicate downward)

velocity of the third particle

v = \sqrt{32.44^2 + (-1.8)^2}

v = 32.49 m/s

tan \theta = \dfrac{-1.8}{32.44}

\theta = tan^{-1}(\dfrac{-1.8}{32.44})

θ = 3.176° (downward with horizontal)

4 0
3 years ago
What is the universe made of? Astronomers face an embarrassing conundrum: they don't know what 95% of the universe is made of​
rewona [7]

Answer:

This what they all been waiting for

I guess so

They been waiting for this sh,it for a long time didn't they

I'ma give it everything I got

Ayo Dougie park that X6 around the corner

Aye I'm just feeling my vibe right now

I'm feeling myself

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose a nonconducting sphere, radius r2, has a spherical cavity of radius r1 centered at the sphere's center. Assuming the cha
leva [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

a ) Between r = 0 and r = r₁

Electric field will be zero . It is so because no charge lies in between r = 0 and r = r₁ .

b ) From r = r₁ to r = r₂

At distance r , charge contained in the sphere of radius r

volume charge density x 4/3 π r³

q = Q x r³ / R³

Applying Gauss's law

4πr² E = q / ε₀

4πr² E = Q x r³ / ε₀R³

E= Q x r / (4πε₀R³)

E ∝ r .

c )

Outside of r = r₂

charge contained in the sphere of radius r = Q

Applying Gauss's law

4πr² E = q / ε₀

4πr² E = Q  / ε₀

E = Q  / 4πε₀r²

E ∝ 1 / r² .

6 0
3 years ago
What current is needed in the solenoid's wires?
marta [7]
Using Ampere's Law, the magnetic field produced inside this solenoid is given by
B = uo N I / h
where uo is the vacuum permeability, N is the number of turns in the solenoid and h is the length of the solenoid. Earth's magnetic field is around 50 microteslas in North America thus the current needed in the solenoid is
I = B h / (uo N) = (50 E-6 ) (4) / ((4 pi E-7)(6000) ) = 0.026 A
I = 26 mA
So you need a current of around 26 mA.
5 0
2 years ago
The half life of uranium-235 is 4. 5 billion years. If 0. 5 half-lives have elapsed, how many years have gone by?
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

2.25 billion years

Explanation:

i am smort

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the acceleration of the object?
    10·1 answer
  • 1. A 2500 kg car enters a curve with a radius of 45 m If the car is moving at a speed of 35 m's, what is the
    11·1 answer
  • Coherent light of frequency 6.32 x 1014 Hz passes through two thin slits and falls on a screen 85.0 cm away. You observe that th
    12·1 answer
  • Choose one of the six fitness related components that are used in gymnastics.
    13·1 answer
  • Perform calculations using the circuit illustrated. Round
    14·1 answer
  • Consider a cylinder initially filled with 9.33 10-4 m3 of ideal gas at atmospheric pressure. An external force is applied to slo
    14·1 answer
  • A girl running around a circular track of radius 200 m completes one
    9·1 answer
  • From fastest to slowest, which of the following lists describes the speed at which sound tends to travel in different materials?
    12·1 answer
  • How is the acceleration of an object in free fall related to the acceleration due to gravity?
    5·1 answer
  • Write true if the statement is false change the underlined word to make the statement true. Write our answers on a separate shee
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!