All categories

3 years ago

PLLLLLLLLLLLZ HELP

Physics

1 answer:

Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago

6 0

The second choice is the correct one.

You can spot it just from the units. An equation can't be true unless it has the same units on both sides.

Wavelength has units of (meters).

Frequency has units of (per second).

When you multiply them, you get (meters per second), the unit of speed, and the 'c' on the other side is speed.

None of the other choices has units of speed on the right side.

You might be interested in

How does energy acquisition in the deep sea differ from energy acquisition near the ocean’s surface? a. Organisms in the deep se

Montano1993 [528]

that would be the energy from the core. because of the fact that ht eearths core is producing 45mill killawhats and giggawats

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Calculate the wavelength of a wave if 5 complete waves occupy a length of 20m

Nezavi [6.7K]

The answer is 20 / 5 = 4

6 0

2 years ago

If a resource is non renewable, it ____

Karolina [17]

it cannot be reuse and replaced for long period of time.hope it helps u

4 0

3 years ago

We know the frequency range of certain sounds are: 400-560 Hz, what are the ranges of wavelength in meters when the signal trans

Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Range of wavelength will be $5.35\times 10^5m$ to $7.5\times 10^5m$

Explanation:

We have given range of frequency is 400-560 Hz

Speed of the light $c=3\times 10^8m/sec$

We have to find the range of the wavelength of signal transmitted

Ween know that velocity is given by $v=\lambda f$ , here $\lambda$ is wavelength and f is frequency

So for 400 Hz frequency wavelength will be $\lambda =\frac{c}{f}=\frac{3\times 10^8}{400}=7.5\times 10^5m$

And wavelength for frequency 560 Hz $\lambda =\frac{c}{f}=\frac{3\times 10^8}{560}=5.35\times 10^5m$

So range of wavelength will be $5.35\times 10^5m$ to $7.5\times 10^5m$

8 0

3 years ago

In Anchorage, collisions of a vehicle with a moose are so common that they are referred to with the abbreviationMVC. Suppose a 1

lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

Part a)

$f = \frac{8}{9}$

Part b)

$f = \frac{120}{169}$

Part c)

So from above discussion we have the result that energy loss will be more if the collision occurs with animal with more mass

Explanation:

Part a)

Let say the collision between Moose and the car is elastic collision

So here we can use momentum conservation

$m_1v_{1i} = m_1v_{1f} + m_2v_{2f}$

$1000 v_o = 1000 v_{1f} + 500 v_{2f}$

also by elastic collision condition we know that

$v_{2f} - v_{1f} = v_o$

now we have

$2v_o = 2v_{1f} + v_o + v_{1f}$

now we have

$v_{1f} = \frac{v_o}{3}$

Now loss in kinetic energy of the car is given as

$\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}m(v_o^2 - v_{1f}^2)$

$\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}m(v_o^2 - \frac{v_o^2}{9})$

so fractional loss in energy is given as

$f = \frac{\Delta K}{K}$

$f = \frac{\frac{4}{9}mv_o^2}{\frac{1}{2}mv_o^2}$

$f = \frac{8}{9}$

Part b)

Let say the collision between Camel and the car is elastic collision

So here we can use momentum conservation

$m_1v_{1i} = m_1v_{1f} + m_2v_{2f}$

$1000 v_o = 1000 v_{1f} + 300 v_{2f}$

also by elastic collision condition we know that

$v_{2f} - v_{1f} = v_o$

now we have

$10v_o = 10v_{1f} + 3(v_o + v_{1f})$

now we have

$v_{1f} = \frac{7v_o}{13}$

Now loss in kinetic energy of the car is given as

$\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}m(v_o^2 - v_{1f}^2)$

$\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}m(v_o^2 - \frac{49v_o^2}{169})$

so fractional loss in energy is given as

$f = \frac{\Delta K}{K}$

$f = \frac{\frac{60}{169}mv_o^2}{\frac{1}{2}mv_o^2}$

$f = \frac{120}{169}$

Part c)

So from above discussion we have the result that energy loss will be more if the collision occurs with animal with more mass

8 0

2 years ago