All categories

3 years ago

How would the absence of gravity affect the formation of planets?

Physics

2 answers:

Doss [256]3 years ago

5 0

Answer : The rocks and debris would never accrete into a planet.

Explanation : Gravity is an attraction force and dependents on the mass of the objects but in the absence of the force the rocks and debris would not come together to form a clump.

So, we can say that in the absence of gravity, the rock and debris would never accrete into a planet.

Maru [420]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is B. The rocks and debris would never accrete into a planet.

Explanation:

Gravity refers to a force of attraction between objects due to their masses. This force is described through the formula F= G M m/ r2 in which G is equal to the gravitational constant, M and m describe the mass of objects, and r refers to the distance.

Moreover, gravity was essential for the formation of planets, stars and other elements in the universe, because this caused gas, dust, rocks, and other particles or elements to aggregate or accrete into planets and other celestial bodies. Moreover, gravity is responsible for phenomena such as planets orbiting. The previous idea implies that without gravity the formation of planets would not have possible and therefore "the rocks and debris would never accrete into a planet".

You might be interested in

5. What is the velocity of a Nolan Catholic football player if he runs 200.0 m in 24.0 s?

Degger [83]

Answer:

$\boxed{ \bold{ \huge{ \boxed {\sf{8.33 \: m \:/s \: }}}}}$

Explanation:

Distance travelled = 200 metre

Time taken = 24 second

Velocity = ?

Finding the velocity 

$\boxed{ \sf{velocity = \frac{distance \: travelled \: }{time \: taken}}}$

$\dashrightarrow{ \sf{velocity = \frac{200 \: m}{24 \: s} }}$

$\dashrightarrow{ \sf{velocity = 8.33 \: m/s}}$

Hope I helped!

Best regards!

6 0

3 years ago

The Cassegrain design provides more compact (shorter) telescopes. Why? (Examine figures 2.4.2 and 2.4.3). The shorter design is

Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

Because the light reflects multiple times until it gets to the Cassegrain focus.

Explanation:

The Cassegrain design can be seen in a reflecting telescope. In this type of design the light is collected by a concave mirror, and then intercepted by a secondary convex mirror, and sends it down to a central opening in the primary mirror (concave mirror), in which a detector is placed (Cassegrain focus)

Since, the light is reflected many times due to Cassegrain design, that leads to shorter telescopes.

5 0

3 years ago

Two ladybugs sit on a rotating disk that is slowing down at a constant rate. The ladybugs are at rest with respect to the surfac

d1i1m1o1n [39]

The two ladybugs have same rotational (angular) speed

Explanation:

The rotational (angular) speed of an object in circular motion is defined as:

$\omega=\frac{\theta}{t}$

where

$\theta$ is the angular displacement

t is the time interval considered

Here we have two ladybugs, which are located at two different distances from the axis. In particular, ladybug 1 is halfway between ladybug 2 and the axis of rotation. However, since they rotate together with the disk, and the disk is a rigid body, every point of the disk cover the same angle $\theta$ in the same time $t$ : this means that every point along the disk has the same angular speed, and therefore the two ladybugs also have the same angular speed.

On the other hand, the linear speed of the two ladybugs is different, because it follows the equation:

$v=\omega r$

where r is the distance from the axis: and since the two ladybugs are located at different $r$ , they have different linear speed.

Learn more about circular motion:

brainly.com/question/2562955

brainly.com/question/6372960

#LearnwithBrainly

3 0

2 years ago

Qué órganos forman parte del sistema nervioso

Dmitry [639]

El cerebro, la medula espinal, y los nervios.

3 0

3 years ago

A rectangular coil with 50 turns of conducting wire and a total resistance of 10.0 Ω initially lies in the yz-plane at time t =

castortr0y [4]

Answer:

a) 43.20V

b) 2.71W/s

c) 40.25s

d) 7.77Nm

Explanation:

(a) The emf of a rotating coil with N turns is given by:

$emf=NBA\omega sin(\omega t)$

N: turns

B: magnitude of the magnetic field

A: area

w: angular velocity

the emf max is given by:

$emf_{max}=NBA\omega=(50)(1.80T)(0.200m*0.100m)(24.0rad/s)\\\\emf_{max}=43.20V$

(b) the maximum rate of change of the magnetic flux is given by:

$\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}=\frac{d(A\cdot B)}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}(ABcos\omega t)=AB\omega sin(\omega t)\\\\\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}_{max}=(\pi(0.200*0.100))(1.80T)(24.0rad/s)=2.71\frac{W}{s}$

(c) $emf(t=0.050s)=(50)(1.80T)(0.200m*0.100m)(24rad/s)sin(24.0rad/s(0.050s))\\\\emf(t=0.050s)=40.26V$

(d) The torque is given by:

$\tau=NABIsin\theta\\\\NAB\omega=emf_{max}\\\\\tau=\frac{emf_{max}}{\omega}\frac{emf_{max}}{R}\\\\\tau=\frac{(43.20V)^2}{(24.0rad/s)(10.0\Omega)}=7.77Nm$

3 0

3 years ago