The number of electrons emitted from the metal per second increases if the intensity of the incident light is increased.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
As a result of photoelectric effect, electrons are emitted by the light incident on a metal surface. The emitted electrons count and its kinetic energy can measure as the function of light intensity and frequency. Like physicists, at the 20th century beginning, it should be expected that the light wave's energy (its intensity) will be transformed into the kinetic energy of emitted electrons.
In addition, the electrons count emitting from metal must vary with light wave frequency. This frequency relationship was expected because the electric field oscillates due to the light wave and the metal electrons react to different frequencies. In other words, the number of electrons emitted was expected to be frequency dependent and their kinetic energy should be dependent on the intensity (constant wavelength) of light.
Thus, the maximum in kinetic energy of electrons emitted increases with increase in light's frequency and is experimentally independent of light intensity. So, the number of emitted electrons is proportionate to the intensity of the incident light.
Radio Station W as the slower the frequency the longer the wave length
d=? v=2.5 u=0 and t=5 therefore the formula to be used to find the distance my brother covered is d=1/2(v-u)t
d=1/2(2.5-0)5
=6.15m
Explanation:
<em>Two</em><em> </em><em>factors</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>affect</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>rater</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>diffusion</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>substance</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em>:</em><em> </em>
- <em>Diffusion</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>substance</em><em> </em><em>plays</em><em> </em><em>an</em><em> </em><em>important</em><em> </em><em>role</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>cellular</em><em> </em><em>transport</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>plants</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
- <em>Diffusion</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>passive</em><em> </em><em>movement</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>substance</em><em> </em><em>from</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>region</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>higher</em><em> </em><em>concentration</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>region</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>lower</em><em> </em><em>concentration</em><em>. </em>
Explanation:
Suppose you want to shine a flashlight beam down a long, straight hallway. Just point the beam straight down the hallway -- light travels in straight lines, so it is no problem. What if the hallway has a bend in it? You could place a mirror at the bend to reflect the light beam around the corner. What if the hallway is very winding with multiple bends? You might line the walls with mirrors and angle the beam so that it bounces from side-to-side all along the hallway. This is exactly what happens in an optical fiber.
The light in a fiber-optic cable travels through the core (hallway) by constantly bouncing from the cladding (mirror-lined walls), a principle called total internal reflection. Because the cladding does not absorb any light from the core, the light wave can travel great distances.
However, some of the light signal degrades within the fiber, mostly due to impurities in the glass. The extent that the signal degrades depends on the purity of the glass and the wavelength of the transmitted light (for example, 850 nm = 60 to 75 percent/km; 1,300 nm = 50 to 60 percent/km; 1,550 nm is greater than 50 percent/km). Some premium optical fibers show much less signal degradation -- less than 10 percent/km at 1,550 nm.
1