Answer:
People behavior with lump sum amount:
The experimental evidence shows that people always expect to be treated fairly. When people are treated unfairly, then they will reject the offer regardless of the value of money. Thus, the statement that "should not generalize the evident resulted from $10 experiment. When the size of money is large then people will react differently from the evidence" is false.
Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
Answer:
B) firms reduce hours before laying off when the economy is in recession, and increase hours before hiring when the economy expands.
Explanation:
In the case when the output falls so the workers would not be laid off in a direct manner. In the first time the labor would be decreased so that the demand could be analyzed. The same would be happen in that case also where the growth picked up
Therefore in the given case, the option B is correct
And the other options are wrong
Answer:
B. Increasing the production of a good requires larger and larger decreases in the production of another good.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost refers to the foregone units of production of a good in exchange for producing units of another good.
Marginal cost on the other hand refers to additional cost incurred when an additional unit is produced.
Marginal opportunity cost relates to the additional opportunity cost incurred when additional unit of second good is produced in exchange for foregoing or sacrificing units of production of first good.
Increasing marginal opportunity cost would mean as more and more units of good A are produced, for each extra unit of production of Good A, higher units of production of Good B are sacrificed i.e larger and larger decrease in the production of another good.
Answer:
can revoke the contract as informal verbal agreements are not binding
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that sherry would pay her $5,000 in the case when she runs marathon now once she starts running so here alan can revoke the contract legally as there is only verbal agreements not the written agreement also they are not binding to each other
So as per the given situation, the above statement should be considered
