Answer:
Cultural relativism
Explanation:
In sociology, the term cultural relativism refers to the notion that one person or culture believes and practices should be studied and understood based on that own person's culture instead of using other culture criteria to judge it. In other words, it is the idea <u>to understand another culture by its own standards and not by the standards of another culture</u>.
Therefore, we can say that cultural relativism is the perspective that tells us that each culture must be understood in terms of the values and ideas of that culture and should not be judged by standards of another culture.
Here is information for both perspectives:
Federalists
I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.
Anti-Federalists
I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.
Answer:
its a science that makes human dumb
Explanation:
it has toooo many nonsenses in it
Producers. Government subsidies are paid to the producer of the product being subsidized. A good example of this is the farm subsidy program in the U.S.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/07/02/GR2006070200024.html
Farmers (producers) are directly paid by the government to grow certain desired crops. Other groups like importers and exporters may benefit from subsidies but the key words in the question are "directly benefits." In other words, who is it receiving the subsidy money from the provider of the subsidy? The producer did.
I’m pretty sure the answer is D.
