Explanation:
The intensity of electric field from a certain point that is assumed is proportional inversely to the square of distance’s magnitude from source. As one can see the electric field intensity is proportional inversely. Then the increase in magnitude of the space between source charge the electric field intensity decreases.
Since the proportionality is to square of distance, hence change or increase in distance is squared and that many times intensity of electric field decreases. So relation between them is inverse proportionality.
Answer: Bohr postulated that electronic energy levels are quantized. Secondly, a photon of light of a particular frequency is emitted when electrons move from a higher to a lower energy levels.
Explanation:
The Bohr model of the atom is the immediate predecessor of the wave mechanical model of the atom. The wave mechanical model refined the Bohr's model by treating the electron as a wave having a wave function psi. The wave function describes the identity of the electron. From Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the position of a particle cannot be accurately and precisely measured. Hence the wave mechanical model added that electrons are not localized in orbits according to Bohr's model but the integral of psi squared dx gives the probability of finding the electron within a given space.
Answer:
Its Convention Current Waves i think
The molecular structure of the solids has lower ability to conduct electricity due to tight holding by nucleus.
<h3>Why molecular solids are poor conductors?</h3>
Molecular solids are also poor conductors of electricity because their valence electrons are tightly held by the nuclear charges present in the nucleus while on the other hand, Metals are good electrical conductors in the solid form due to the presence of free electrons that helps in the conduction of electricity.
Learn more about electricity here: brainly.com/question/25144822
To calculate the <span>δ h, we must balance first the reaction:
NO + 0.5O2 -----> NO2
Then we write all the reactions,
2O3 -----> 3O2 </span><span>δ h = -426 kj eq. (1)
O2 -----> 2O </span><span>δ h = 490 kj eq. (2)
NO + O3 -----> NO2 + O2 </span><span>δ h = -200 kj eq. (3)
We divide eq. (1) by 2, we get
</span>O3 -----> 1.5O2 δ h = -213 kj eq. (4)
Then, we subtract eq. (3) by eq. (4)
NO + O3 -----> NO2 + O2 δ h = -200 kj
- (O3 -----> 1.5 O2 δ h = -213 kj)
NO -----> NO2 - 0.5O2 δ h = 13 kj eq. (5)
eq. (2) divided by -2. (Note: Dividing or multiplying by negative number reverses the reaction)
O -----> 0.5O2 <span>δ h = -245 kj eq. (6)
</span>
Add eq. (6) to eq. (5), we get
NO -----> NO2 - 0.5O2 δ h = 13 kj
+ O -----> 0.5O2 δ h = -245 kj
NO + O ----> NO2 δ h = -232 kj
<em>ANSWER:</em> <em>NO + O ----> NO2 δ h = -232 kj</em>
