Answer:
The nuclear charge increases from boron to carbon, but there is no additional shielding( that is no additional shells).
Explanation:
First of all, we must know the electron configuration of carbon and boron.
Boron- 1s2 2s2 2p1
Carbon- 1s2 2s2 2p2
Moving from boron to carbon, the effective nuclear charge increases without a corresponding increase in the number of shells. Remember that shielding increases with increase in the number of intervening shells between the outermost electron and the nucleus. Since there isn't an increase in shells, boron experience a lower screening effect.
From
Zeff= Z- S
The Z for carbon is 6 while for boron is 5 even though both have the same number of screening electron S(4 screening electrons). Hence it is expected the Zeff(effective nuclear charge) for boron will be less than that of carbon.
<span>Africa was more south and west and South America was more south and east of their current positions. I would say this would be because because South America and Africa used to be together in Gondwanaland millions of years ago and then apparently drifted apart as Wegener thought and then with the advent of plate tectonics it became apparent that the mid-Atlantic ridge runs between them and due to spreading along it Africa and S America got separated.</span>
Fatty acids are composed of hydrocarbon chains and a carboxyl group.
<h3>What are Fatty acids ?</h3>
Fatty acids are the building blocks of the fat in our bodies and in the food we eat.
During digestion, the body breaks down fats into fatty acids, which can then be absorbed into the blood.
Fatty acid molecules are usually joined together in groups of three, forming a molecule called a triglyceride.
Generally, a fatty acid consists of a straight chain of an even number of carbon atoms, with hydrogen atoms along the length of the chain and at one end of the chain and a carboxyl group (―COOH) at the other end.
It is that carboxyl group that makes it an acid (carboxylic acid).
Learn more about Fatty Acids here ;
brainly.com/question/13528495
#SPJ1
B. inference because she drew a conclusion based on evidence.
Because the evidence was that she heard the crashing sound, and then when she came into her room saw the broken window and baseball.
It was not an observation because she did not directly see the baseball going through the window
