That's 105 km that he flew, or 65.2 miles ! I'm absolutely positive
that the crow must have landed and gotten some rest when you
weren't looking. But that had no effect on his displacement when
he got where he was going, so we can continue to solve the problem:
The displacement is the distance and direction from the place
where the crow took off to the place where he landed.
-- It's distance is the hypotenuse of the right triangle whose legs
are 60 km and 45 km.
D² = (60 km)² + (45 km)²
= 3,600 km² + 2,025 km² = 5,625 km²
D = √(5625 km²) = 75 km .
-- It's direction is the angle whose tangent is (45 S / 60 W).
tan⁻¹ (45/60) = tan⁻¹ (0.75) = 36.9° south of west
= 53.1° west of south.
= not exactly southwest but close.
In mathematics, a percentage is a number or ratio expressed as a fraction of 100.
Answer:
No, it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder model when finding the temperatures near the bottom or top surfaces of a cylinder.
Explanation:
A cylinder is said to be infinitely long when is of a sufficient length. Also, when the diameter of the cylinder is relatively small compared to the length, it is called infinitely long cylinder.
Cylindrical rods can also be treated as infinitely long when dealing with heat transfers at locations far from the top or bottom surfaces. However, it not proper to treat the cylinder as being infinitely long when:
* When the diameter and length are comparable (i.e have the same measurement)
When finding the temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder, it is NOT PROPER TO USE AN INFINITELY LONG CYLINDER because heat transfer at those locations can be two-dimensional.
Therefore, the answer to the question is NO, since it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder when finding temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder.
Answer:
I don't think your appendix can explode because you ate too much honestly. It's not even possible to eat so much that your appendix explodes, and if you're feeling any pain it definitely isn't because your appendix is about to explode, believe me. Also you could just type it into the internet, that'd be a much faster solution.
Answer:
D. Both occur between objects independently whether they are in contact or not.
Explanation:
- The gravitational force is a force that is exerted between two (or more) objects having mass. This force is always attractive and its magnitude is given by

where G is the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the two masses, and r is the distance between the two masses.
- The electrical force is a force that is exerted between two (or more) objects having electrical charge. It can be either attractive or repulsive, depending on the sign of the two charges, and its magnitude is given by

where k is the Coulomb's constant, q1 and q2 are the two charges, and r the distance between the two charges.
Looking at both formulas, we see that the two forces are present even when the two objects are not in contact with each other (in fact, r can assume any value in the formula). They are said to be non-contact forces. Therefore, the correct option is
D. Both occur between objects independently whether they are in contact or not.