In the aftermath of the event in 2010, regarding the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill The United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Oil Industry Company, BP, and its associates for violations under the Clean Water Act in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Lousiana - court that took the case to be heard, although BP and its associates intially wanted it to be heard at Houston.
Well colonial America had a lot less people and pretty much no government, so you would pretty much be able to do whatever you want, short of major offenses and get away with it.
A down side would be, There was a lot of disease and you would have to work extremely hard day and night, to make a living and to be able to eat. you would also most likely have to fight Indians.
I hope this helps, Have an amazing day!
China is superior to India in many ways.
- Unemployment rate is higher (4,5% in China and 3,4% in India).
- China has a striking high proportion of women workers; their labour force participation is more than twice that of their Indian peers.
- China’s literacy rate has reached a remarkable level, especially given that people must learn characters rather than an alphabet. Over 96% of the population are literate - compared to just over 71% in India.
- China is notorious for its lack of press freedom. But Reporters Without Borders suggests that India has plenty of problems too.
- A baby born in China can expect to live for nine years longer than one born in India.
- India has a split society in terms of race and religion. People are being killed for eating beef, foreigners are attacked for difamation of temples.
They would not pay taxes on their tea, plain and simple. The Boston Tea Party is also important because of both the British and American responses to the actions that followed the tea party.
The answer to your question is:
<h2><em>Erasmus</em></h2>
Desiderius Erasmus was a Dutch Christian humanist who was the greatest who originally trained as a Catholic priest, Erasmus was an important figure in classical scholarship who wrote in a pure Latin style. He was called the "Prince of the Humanists", and "the crowning glory of the Christian humanists". He was part of the religious Reformation, who criticized the abuses of the Catholic Church.
