The truth is 100% Rule doesn’t
imply that the optimal solution will automatically change if the percentage exceeds
100%. The 100% Rule compares, proposed
changes to allowed changes. The value of the objective function will change,
but the values of the decision variables and the dual prices will stay the
same.
<span> </span>
Answer:
(A) in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Explanation:
It has the company's financial statements and also describes the key policies that are being followed by the accounting department. This policy summary is mandated by the accounting framework like IFRS or GAAP.
Answer:
There will be a net flow of gold from the United States to Japan
Explanation:
A trade surplus represents a net inflow of domestic currency from foreign markets. It is the opposite of a trade deficit, which represents a net outflow, and occurs when the result of the above calculation is negative.
Answer:
management has not explained its business purpose
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the firm is engaged in the new financial transaction that contains the material impact on the earnings so this represents that it could be come under the pre existed accounting standards.
Also everyone should be aware of the business purpose plus it is not established for changing off the financial statements
So it would be suspicious because the purpose of the business could not be explained
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
