Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 25
The mean is 
The standard deviation is 
The z-score is z = -1.94
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the p-value is mathematically evaluated as
From the z table the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to -1.94 is
=> 
=> 
Let assume the level of significance is 
Hence the 
this mean that
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Thank you sooo much Maddi441
Given this equation:
That represents t<span>he height of a tree in feet over (x) years. Let's analyze each statement according to figure 1 that shows the graph of this equation.
</span>
The tree's maximum height is limited to 30 ft.
As shown in figure below, the tree is not limited, so this statement is false.
<span>
The tree is initially 2 ft tall
The tree was planted in x = 0, so evaluating the function for this value, we have:
</span>
<span>
<span>So, the tree is initially
tall.
</span>
Therefore this statement is false.
</span>
Between the 5th and 7th years, the tree grows approximately 7 ft.
<span>
if x = 5 then:
</span>
<span>
</span>if x = 7 then:
So, between the 5th and 7th years the height of the tree remains constant
:
This is also a false statement.
<span>
After growing 15 ft, the tree's rate of growth decreases.</span>
It is reasonable to think that the height of this tree finally will be 301ft. Why? well, if x grows without bound, then the term
approaches zero.
Therefore this statement is also false.
Conclusion: After being planted this tree won't grow.
