1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
10

Please help meeee > THANK YOU!!!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

39.   An adult male Western Banded Gecko is 5 1/2 (or 5.5) inches long.

41.    13,000 feet long, because 1 4/9 of 9,000 is 13,000.

43.  to answer the question we need to know if 35 out of 50 states is equal or greater than 3/4 if that is the case, the Constitution will be ammended, and that is represented like this:

35/50 >= 3/4

that inequality is saying that 35 states out of 50 is equal or greater than 3/4, lets simplify and modify the fractions to compare easily:

35/50 >= 3/4

7/10 >= 3/4

now we need to find the least common multiplier of 10 and 4 to take the fractions to a common denominator and compare easy. Lets multiply numerator and denominator for a correct number to get the fractions to denominator common 20, the lcm:

7/10 >= 3/4

(2/2)(7/10) >= (5/5)(3/4)

2*7/2*10 >= 5*3/5*4

14/20 >= 15/20

we can see that the inequality does not hold, so,

35/50 >= 3/4

does not hold either, therefore the Constitution cannot be ammended

40.  10 students play chess and sudoku,

30*2/5 is 12, out of 12; the number of students that play chess,5/6 play sudoku.

So..12*5/6 is 10 and that is the number of students that play both sudoku and chess.

42. Four fifths of 7/8 will be less than 7/8 (because you've multiplied by a number less than 1).

Similarly, 7/8 of 4/5 will be less than 4/5.

This means that the product will be less than each of the original factors.  

answer: no

44.  The answer is 7/12 because 3/4 - 1/6= 7/12

3/4 converts to 9/12 and 1/6 converts to 2/12. The domanaters stay the same, but 9-2=7. that is how you get 7/12

You might be interested in
Pls help asap MIDSEGMENTS
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

Angle 2 = 64°

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle 2 = 180°-116° (int angles, 12//34)

=64°

4 0
2 years ago
Any help is appreciated!
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I would help but i havent even learned that yet. But i will ask my older sister

5 0
3 years ago
What is f (x)=2x^2+5 multiplied by g (x)=2x<br><br>A) 7x+2x<br>B) 4x+10x<br>C)4x^2+10x<br>D)4x^3+10x
Afina-wow [57]
I hope this helps you

5 0
3 years ago
I REALLY NEED HELP ON THIS PLS HELP
Eva8 [605]

Part (a)

Answer: See the attached image below to see the filled out chart.

Note how rational and irrational numbers have nothing in common. This means there is no overlap. So they go in the rectangles. The two sets of numbers join up to form the entire set of real numbers.

Integers are in the set of rational numbers. This is because something like 7 is also 7/1; however 1/7 is not an integer. So not all rational numbers are integers. The larger purple circle is the set of integers.

The smaller blue circle is the set of whole numbers. The set of whole numbers is a subset of integers. Recall the set of whole numbers is {0,1,2,3,...} so we ignore the negative values only focusing on 0 and positive numbers that don't have any fractional values. In contrast, the set of integers is {..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...} here we do include the negatives.

============================================================

Part (b)

1) Some irrational numbers are integers.

This is false. An irrational number is not rational. The set of integers is contained entirely in the set of rational numbers.

---------------------------------

2) Some whole numbers are not irrational numbers.

This is false. The statement implies that some whole numbers are irrational, but the set of whole numbers is inside the set of rational numbers, which has no overlap with the irrationals. The statement should be "All whole numbers are not irrational numbers".

---------------------------------

3) All rational numbers are whole numbers.

This is false. A rational number like 1/3 is not a whole number.

---------------------------------

4) All integers are whole numbers

This is false. An integer like -44 is not a whole number because the set of whole numbers is {0,1,2,3,...} and we're not including negative values.

---------------------------------

In summary, all four statements for part (b) are false.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hello! Question.
Bumek [7]
If I’m analyzing the question correct, you would pay 912 in total
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the approximate area of a circle with a radius of 15 ft?
    12·1 answer
  • 7 out of every 8 children surveyed owns a bike. The difference between the number of students who owns a bike and those who do n
    7·1 answer
  • How do you do this? Why's the answer??
    8·2 answers
  • 50pts!!! I need proper help and an easy to understand explanation.
    14·1 answer
  • The constant of proportionality
    7·1 answer
  • I'm thinking of two numbers: a and b.
    12·2 answers
  • Pls help urgently extra points and mark w
    7·2 answers
  • Please help guys its due soon 24 points
    14·2 answers
  • what is the answer to number one? I have no clue and it is my first grade I really don’t want to fail please only told me if you
    9·1 answer
  • Help im not sure anyone have any idea
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!