Answer:
2² • 89
The prime factors are: 2 x 2 x 89
or also written as { 2, 2, 89 }
Written in exponential form: 2² x 891
Step-by-step explanation:
56 ÷ 2 = 178 - No remainder! 2 is one of the factors!
178 ÷ 2 = 89 - No remainder! 2 is one of the factors!
89 ÷ 2 = 44.5 - There is a remainder. We can't divide by 2 evenly anymore. Let's try the next prime number
89 ÷ 3 = 29.6667 - This has a remainder. 3 is not a factor.
89 ÷ 5 = 17.8 - This has a remainder. 5 is not a factor.
89 ÷ 7 = 12.7143 - This has a remainder. 7 is not a factor.
Explanation:
Distributive property: →
Multiply by the numbers from left to right.
Then, you can also divide into the numbers.
Product it's going to be multiply by the numbers, fractions, factors, and multiples.
Hope this helps!
Thanks!
Have a great day!
Answer:
(x +5)²/4 +(y +8)²/36 = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of an ellipse with center (h, k) and semi-axes "a" and "b" (where "a" is in the x-direction and "b" is in the y-direction) can be written as ...
((x -h)/a)² +((y -k)/b)² = 1
Here, the center is at (h, k) = (-5, -8), and the semi-minor axis is a=2, while the semi-major axis is b=6.
The equation can be written as ...
((x +5)/2)² +((y +8)/6)² = 1
More conventionally, it is written ...
(x +5)²/4 +(y +8)²/36 = 1
Answer:
v/lh = w
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide Both Sides by the length and height to isolate width.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in the June 2007 issue, Consumer Reports also examined the relative merits of top-loading and front-loading washing machines, testing samples of several different brands of each type.
The difference in mean values test gave a p value of 0.32
Confidence level = 95%
Alpha = 1-0.95 = 0.05
Compare p with alpha, here p >alpha
Hence we accept null hypothesis that there is no difference in the means.
Confidence interval method also will yield the same result. i.e. confidence interval for difference of means would definitely contain 0 at 95% conf level.
So answer is yes