If you increase the number of trials in an experiment it will make the test more valid and legitimate.As you take the same test/experiment once or twice you could see if your results are similar to each other.
The net force on the block perpendicular to the floor is
∑ F[perp] = F[normal] - mg = 0
so that
F[normal] = (5 kg) g = 49 N
Then
F[friction] = 0.1 F[normal] = 4.9 N
so that the net force parallel to the floor is
∑ F[para] = -4.9 N = (5 kg) a
Solve for the acceleration a :
a = (-4.9 N) / (5 kg) = -0.98 m/s²
Starting with an initial velocity of 5 m/s, the box comes to a stop after time t such that
0 = 5 m/s - (0.98 m/s²) t
⇒ t ≈ 5.1 s
If that statement were true, then you would never have any reason to eat.
It might taste good for a while, but it would never help you stand up and
move around.
Where WOULD you get the energy to stand up and walk, if it didn't
come from food ? ?
The whole idea is pretty absurd. I guess the statement is not true.
Answer:
350 ft/s²
Explanation:
First, convert mph to ft/s.
58 mi/hr × (5280 ft/mi) × (1 hr / 3600 s) = 85.1 ft/s
Given:
v₀ = 85.1 ft/s
v = 0 ft/s
t = 0.24 s
Find: a
v = at + v₀
a = (v − v₀) / t
a = (0 ft/s − 85.1 ft/s) / 0.24 s
a = -354 ft/s²
Rounded to two significant figures, the magnitude of the acceleration is 350 ft/s².
Charging a balloon and rubbing it on wool is an example of static electricity.
:)
