Answer:
1/2
8
Step-by-step explanation:
When its talking about the result or output, look at the range, and then follow the line(s) back to the number(s) in the domain. Do the opposite when it's talking about the function of a certain number, e.g. f(4).
I tryed my best to figure out what all of the numbers were. if i got any wrong then please tell me and i will put the right answer in the comments.
1) 3/5= 5/x (cross multiply)
3x=5(5)
3x=25
x= 25/3 -or- 8.33
2) 2/4=x/12<span> (cross multiply</span><span>)
</span> 2(12)=4x
24=4x
6=x
3) 10/x=5/9<span> (cross multiply</span><span>)
10(9)=5x
90=5x
18=x
4) 5/5=x/18</span><span> (cross multiply</span><span>)
5(18)=18x
90=18x
5=x</span>
The function, g(x), has a constant rate of change and will increase at a faster rate than the function f(x) for all the values of x.
Given:
g(x) = 5/2 x -3 ..... (1)
f(x) = - 3.5 at x = 0
So, putting the value of x=0 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
g(x) at x = 0
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (0) - 3
=> g(x) = -3
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to -3.5.
Similarly, put x = 1 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (1) - 3
=> g(x) = (5-6)/2
=> g(x) = -1/2
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to -1.
Similarly, put x = 2 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (2) - 3
=> g(x) = (5-3)
=> g(x) = 2
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to 1.5.
Similarly, put x = 3 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (3) - 3
=> g(x) = (15/2 - 3)
=> g(x) = 7.5 - 3
=> g(x) = 4.5
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to 4.
Therefore, for all values of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x).
function f(x).
To learn more about the function visit: brainly.com/question/14996787
#SPJ1
Answer: 1.87 games
Step-by-step explanation:
step 1 ; x= 3+2+4+7 divide 4 = 16/4 = 4 games
Add the two values being multiplied by m
37.26 + 2.7 = 39.96
39.96 m + 0.0015 is the most simplified you can get without having a way of finding the value of m. I apologize if I am mistaken, but I'm fairly certain! :)
