Answer:
25%
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can conclude that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI, because you can see/interpret that there all the angles are congruent with one another, like with vertical angles (∠GIH and ∠KIJ) and alternate interior angles (∠H and ∠J, ∠G and ∠K).
We also know that we have two congruent sides, since it provides the information that line GK bisects line HJ, meaning that they have been split evenly (they have been split, with even/same lengths).
<u><em>So now we have three congruent angles, and two congruent sides. This is enough to prove that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI,</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
Answer:
I am a 4th grader I don't know
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$64
Step-by-step explanation:
After using a 25% discount coupon, they paid 48 for the video game.
It means, <em>which number, decreased by 25%, would give us 48?</em>
<em />
First, 25% to decimal is:
25/100 = 0.25
Now, if we let the original price be "x", we can say:
x decreased by 0.25 of x would give us 48
Translating this to algebraic equation gives us:
x - 0.25x = 48
Now, we solve this:
If they paid full price, the video game would cost $64
Answer:
The inverse relation G^(-1) is not a function. Why not? Because the y value y = 3 is paired up with more than one x value (x = 5, x = 2). The inverse relation G^(-1) is the set shown below
{(3,5), (3,2), (4,6)}
All I've done is swap the (x,y) values for each ordered pair to form the inverse relation. As you can see, x = 3 leads to multiple y value outputs which is why this relation is not a function. So in short, the answer is choice C. To have the inverse relation be a function, each value in the original domain must map to exactly one value in the range only. However that doesn't happen as the domain values map to an overlapping y value (y = 3).
