All categories

3 years ago

Which best describes ionic compound formulas?

Chemistry

2 answers:

Leokris [45]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

they have an equal number of positive and negative charges

Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

They have an equal number of positive and negative charges.

Explanation:

The person above me is correct, plz thank him, not me

You might be interested in

What is the limiting reagent when 49.84 g of nitrogen react with 10.7 g of hydrogen to make ammonia

IgorLugansk [536]

If we were to make room for errors, there should really be no limiting reagent because practically all of both Nitrogen and Hydrogen is used up during this reaction. If this values were actually exact, then Nitrogen would be the limiting reagent, but a very very little amount of Nitogen is needed for all the Hydrogen to react.

We solve this problem by first writing the equation
N2 + 3H2 = 2NH3
N2 = 14g*2 = 28g, 3H2 = 3(1*2) = 6g
so 28g of Nitrogen needs 6g of Hydrogen for this reaction. Thus if we had 10.67g of Hydrogen in the reaction, 6g*49.84g/28g of hydrogen is needed to react = 10.68g of Hydrogen, but since we have 10.7g of it thus it is excess and thus the limiting reagent has to be Nitrogen, but notice that 10.68g and 10.7g are practically the same, so there might actually not be a limiting reagent. Using the other value(10.7), the amount of Nitrogen required would be 10.7g*28g/6g = 49.93, and since this is slightly more than the 49.84g we have, this confirms that Nitrogen is the limiting reagent. But note still that since this values are really close, there is a possibility that there is neither a limiting nor an excess reagent

8 0

3 years ago

Solution A has a pH of 3, and solution B has a pH of 5. Which statement best

Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

C. Solution B is less acidic than solution A.

8 0

3 years ago

The concentration of copper(II) sulfate in one brand of soluble plant fertilizer is 0.070% by weight. If a 21.5 g sample of this

Semmy [17]

Answer:

The molar concentration of $Cu^{2+}$ ions in the given amount of sample is $4.73\times 10^{-5}M$

Explanation:

Given that,

Mass of sample = 21.5 g

0.07 % (m/m) of copper (II) sulfate in plant fertilizer

This means that, in 100 g of plant fertilizer, 0.07 g of copper (II) sulfate is present

So, in 20 g of plant fertilizer

, $=\frac{0.07}{100}\times 21.5}\\=0.0151g$ of copper (II) sulfate is present.

To calculate the molarity of solution, we use the equation:

$\text{Molarity of the solution}=\frac{\text{Mass of solute}}{\text{Molar mass of solute}\times \text{Volume of solution (in L)}}$

Mass of solute (copper (II) sulfate) = 0.0151 g

Molar mass of copper (II) sulfate = 159.6 g/mol

Volume of solution = 2.0 L

$\text{Molarity of solution}=\frac{0.0151g}{159.6g/mol\times 2.0L}\\\\\text{Molarity of solution}=4.73\times 10^{-5}M$

The chemical equation for the ionization of copper (II) sulfate follows:

$CuSO_4\rightarrow Cu^{2+}+SO_4^{2-}$

1 mole of copper (II) sulfate produces 1 mole of copper (II) ions and sulfate ions

Molarity of copper (II) ions = $4.73\times 10^{-5}M$

Hence, the molar concentration of $Cu^{2+}$ ions in the given amount of sample is $4.73\times 10^{-5}M$

4 0

3 years ago

Ribosome are found ____

evablogger [386]

It's found inside of a cell attached to the cytoplasm and attached to the endoplasmic reticulum. hope this helps

6 0

3 years ago

Describe 2 ways of salting out proteins

liubo4ka [24]

The phenomenon known as "salting-out" occurs at very high ionic strengths, when protein solubility declines as ionic strength rises. As a result, salting out may be used to segregate proteins according to how soluble they are in salt solutions.

Because large levels of sodium chloride disturb the bonds and structure of the active site, the rate of enzyme activity will gradually decrease as the concentration of sodium chloride rises. As a result, some of the active sites get denaturized and the starch loses its ability to attach to them. As more enzymes get denatured and eventually cease to function, enzyme activity will steadily wane.

8 0

2 years ago