Answer:
The correct answer is - A. The data comparing the fruits produced per flower with the number of butterfly visits are most useful in refuting the claim, because they show that the tree produces fruit even if the butterfly does not visit the flowers.
Explanation:
In this experiment, the table shows that specific butterflies did not go to small flower trees or go once a day where is in medium and large flower trees respectively they visit more than small flowers.
Even after not visiting small flower trees the nectar energy and the fruit production is almost similar to the other two trees. This case can occur only in one case if there are one or more pollinators present in this scenario other than this type of specific butterflies.
Thus, the correct answer is - option A.
I think there’s some data missing! Is it possible to have the graphs with the reaction rate please?
Cells contain a transforming factor summarizes the findings of Griffith.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Numerous experts assigned to the description of DNA as the genetic material. During the 1920s, Frederick Griffith obtained an outstanding invention. He was inquiring two separate forces of a bacterium, called R (rough) strain and S (smooth) strain. He infused the two strains into mice.
Griffith settled that the R-strain bacteria must have brought up a "transforming principle" from the heat-killed S bacteria, which enabled them to "transform" into smooth-coated bacteria and become injurious. He called this method transformation, as something was "transforming" the bacteria of one strain into another strain.