Answer:
38
Explanation:
Symbol: Sr
Atomic mass: 87.62 u
Electrons per shell: 2,8,18,8,2
Atomic number: 38
Electron configuration: [Kr] 5s2
Van der Waals radius: 255 pm
Valence electrons: two
Answer is: n<span>o, because the ion product is less than the Ksp of lead iodide. </span>
Chemical dissociation 1: KI(s) → K⁺(aq) + I⁻(aq).
Chemical dissociation 2: Pb(NO₃)₂(s) → Pb²⁺(aq) + 2NO₃⁻(aq).
Chemical reaction: Pb²⁺(aq) + 2I⁻(aq) → PbI₂(s).
Ksp(PbI₂) = 7.1·10⁻⁹.
V = 500 mL ÷ 1000 mL/L = 0.5 L.
c(KI) = c(I⁻) = 0.0025 mol ÷ 0.5 L.
c(I⁻) = 0.005 M.
c(Pb(NO₃)₂) = c(Pb²⁺) = 0.00004 mol ÷ 0.5 L.
c(Pb²⁺) = 0.00008 M.
Q = c(Pb²⁺) · c(I⁻)².
Q = 8·10⁻⁵ M · (5·10⁻³ M)².
Q = 2·10⁻⁹; <span> the ion product.</span>
0.040 mol / dm³. (2 sig. fig.)
<h3>Explanation</h3>
in this question acts as a weak base. As seen in the equation in the question, produces 
rather than 
when it dissolves in water. The concentration of will likely be more useful than that of for the calculations here.
Finding the value of ![[\text{OH}^{-}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D)
from pH:
Assume that 
,
.
![[\text{OH}^{-}] =10^{-\text{pOH}} =10^{-2.80} = 1.59\;\text{mol}\cdot\text{dm}^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D%20%3D10%5E%7B-%5Ctext%7BpOH%7D%7D%20%3D10%5E%7B-2.80%7D%20%3D%201.59%5C%3B%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5Ccdot%5Ctext%7Bdm%7D%5E%7B-3%7D)
.
Solve for ![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{initial}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Binitial%7D)
:
![\dfrac{[\text{OH}^{-}]_\text{equilibrium}\cdot[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}]_\text{equilibrium}}{[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{equilibrium}} = \text{K}_b = 1.58\times 10^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%5Ccdot%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%7B%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Ctext%7BK%7D_b%20%3D%201.58%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D)
Note that water isn't part of this expression.
The value of Kb is quite small. The change in is nearly negligible once it dissolves. In other words,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{initial} = [(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{final}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Binitial%7D%20%3D%20%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bfinal%7D)
.
Also, for each mole of produced, one mole of 
was also produced. The solution started with a small amount of either species. As a result,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}] = [\text{OH}^{-}] = 10^{-2.80} = 1.58\times 10^{-3}\;\text{mol}\cdot\text{dm}^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%20%3D%20%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D%20%3D%2010%5E%7B-2.80%7D%20%3D%201.58%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D%5C%3B%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5Ccdot%5Ctext%7Bdm%7D%5E%7B-3%7D)
.
![\dfrac{[\text{OH}^{-}]_\text{equilibrium}\cdot[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}]_\text{equilibrium}}{[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\textbf{initial}} = \text{K}_b = 1.58\times 10^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%5Ccdot%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%7B%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctextbf%7Binitial%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Ctext%7BK%7D_b%20%3D%201.58%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D)
,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\textbf{initial} =\dfrac{[\text{OH}^{-}]_\text{equilibrium}\cdot[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{NH}^{+}]_\text{equilibrium}}{\text{K}_b}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctextbf%7Binitial%7D%20%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%5B%5Ctext%7BOH%7D%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%5Ccdot%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BNH%7D%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Bequilibrium%7D%7D%7B%5Ctext%7BK%7D_b%7D)
,
![[(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{N}]_\text{initial} =\dfrac{(1.58\times10^{-3})^{2}}{6.3\times10^{-5}} = 0.040\;\text{mol}\cdot\text{dm}^{-3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%28%5Ctext%7BCH%7D_3%29_3%5Ctext%7BN%7D%5D_%5Ctext%7Binitial%7D%20%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%281.58%5Ctimes10%5E%7B-3%7D%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B6.3%5Ctimes10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%20%3D%200.040%5C%3B%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5Ccdot%5Ctext%7Bdm%7D%5E%7B-3%7D)
.
Ok the ML (the 3rd number) is not legit because the ML value can only be from -L to L (the second value)
