Yes
Explanation:
It is a reasonable result obtained.
Error = true value - measured value
true value = 24.5
measured value = 24.2
Error = 24.5 - 24.2 = 0.3g
The error reported in the reading is 0.3g
The reason why we had a disparity in the figures obtained from this measurement is primarily due to some erroneous scale.
The mixture at the end of the day is a solution.
We are expected to have the same mass but due to experimental or some form of random error introduced, we noticed a difference.
The value obtained is quite logical as we only had a deviation of 0.3g.
learn more:
Error brainly.com/question/2764830
#learnwithBrainly
From a balistics pendulum as an example, which is probably where you are at...
Triangles, L = 12m, x_0 = 1.6, we need to find the angle (theta)
sin (theta) = 1.6/12 = 0.1333....
theta = ArcSin(0.1333...) = 0.1337 rad
Then, this is the height that the mass vertically raises in it's arc
y_2 = L-L*cos(theta) = 0.107 m
use y_2 in a kinematic swing...
<span><span>v=sqrt(<span><span>2g<span>y_2)</span></span></span>=1.45m/s</span></span>
In stars more massive than the sun, the core temperature is hotter, which allows for fusion of more complex elements.
Most of the fusion occurs in the core.
In stars more massive than the sun, fusion continues through Deuterium, Carbon, and finally reaching iron/nickel.
Up to this point, the fusion reaction was endothermic, which means that the energy expended to produce the fusion reaction was exceeded by the energy produced in the reaction.
Fusion past iron is exothermic, and therefore the star will be able to survive by fusing elements heavier than iron.
After the core is almost entirely iron, the star is no longer in the Main Sequence.
So, fusion in stars more massive than the sun continue fusing until the core is almost entirely <em>iron</em>.
Answer:
the extension recorded by the student would be smaller than the actual extension of the spring
Anything times zero is zero
