1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Len [333]
3 years ago
5

Which requires the most amount of work by breaks of a car?

Physics
1 answer:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
5 0

The answer is not 'A'.
Using the numbers given in the question, it's 'B'.

It WOULD be 'A' if the number in B were 71 or less.
________________________________

<span>This is not as simple as it looks.

What quantity are we going to compare between the two cases ?
Yes, I know ... the "amount of work".  But how to find that from the
numbers given in the question ?
Is it the same as the change in speed ?
Well ?  Is it ?
NO.  IT's NOT.

In order to reduce the car's speed, the brakes have to absorb
the KINETIC ENERGY, and THAT changes in proportion to
the SQUARE of the speed.  ( KE = 1/2 m V² )

Case 'A' :
The car initially has (1/2 m) (100²)
                             = (1/2m) x            10,000 units of KE.

It slows down to       (1/2 m) x (70²)
                             = (1/2m) x              4,900 units of KE.

The brakes have absorbed  (10,000 - 4,900) = 5,100 units of KE.

Case 'B' :
The car initially has (1/2 m) (79²)
                             = (1/2m) x             6,241 units of KE.

It slows down to a stop . . . NO kinetic energy.

The brakes have absorbed all  6,241 units of KE.

Just as we suspected when we first read the problem,
the brakes do more work in Case-B, bringing the car
to a stop from 79, than they do when slowing the car
from 100  to  70 .

But when we first read the problem and formed that
snap impression, we did it for the wrong reason.
Here, I'll demonstrate:

Change Case-B.  Make it "from 71 km/h to a stop".

Here's the new change in kinetic energy for Case-B:

The car initially has (1/2 m) (71²)
                             = (1/2m) x             5,041 units of KE.
It slows down to a stop . . . NO kinetic energy.
The brakes have absorbed all  5,041  units of KE.

-- To slow from 100 to 70, the brakes absorbed 5,100 units of KE.

-- Then, to slow the whole rest of the way from 71 to a stop,
the brakes absorbed only 5,041 units of KE.

-- The brakes did more work to slow the car the first 30 km/hr
than to slow it to a complete stop from 71 km/hr or less.

That's why you can't just say that the bigger change in speed
requires the greater amount of work.
______________________________________

It works exactly the same in the opposite direction, too.

It takes less energy from the engine to accelerate the car
from rest to 70 km/hr than it takes to accelerate it the
next 30, to 100 km/hr !</span>

(The exact break-even speed for this problem is  50√2 km/h,
or  70.711... km/hr rounded. )

You might be interested in
HELPPP PLS BESTIES A pattern of stars that has been named is called a constellation. One winter evening, Jason found the star ca
Damm [24]

Answer:

D) Since the stars would move from East to West just as the Sun and Moon do.

5 0
3 years ago
What statements correctly describe magnetism?
insens350 [35]
A best describes magnetism
3 0
3 years ago
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME
s2008m [1.1K]
The answer should be B
5 0
3 years ago
Who has the greater velocity, an astronaut who has just completed an orbit of the Earth or you when you have just traveled from
Alik [6]

Answer:

the answer is

Explanation:

constant acceleration

because when the object's velocity is changing then the object is accelerating or decelerating

as acceleration describe changing of velocity so the answer is constant acceleration

Acceleration is defined as the rate of change of velocity.

Acceleration = (Change in velocity) / time taken

Acceleration = (Final velocity - initial velocity) / time

As the object velocity changes by the same amount in each second, it means the acceleration is constant.

Hope I can help u

4 0
3 years ago
We reduce friction in machines? why<br>​
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

friction reduces the efficiency of machines, thus we must reduce the friction force that is acting upon it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Y u y u bully me121212121
    13·2 answers
  • You use 40 N of force to push a box of books 3.2 m along the floor how much work is being done
    5·2 answers
  • A silica-rich igneous rock that has large crystals and makes up much of the continental crust is ________
    5·1 answer
  • If different groups of scientist have access to the same data, how can they draw different conclusions?
    5·1 answer
  • An air bubble has a volume of 1.3 cm3 when it is released by a submarine 160 m below the surface of a freshwater lake. What is t
    15·1 answer
  • An empty capacitor is connected to a 12.0 V battery and charged up. The capacitor is then disconnected from the battery, and a s
    10·1 answer
  • 13. If you have a 12 kg object, how do you find the weight?
    14·1 answer
  • The unit for frequency is Hertz, or cycles per second. Question 5 options: True False
    7·1 answer
  • Although most no. 10 wire used is solid, when would it be beneficial to use the stranded type? a. when connectors will be crimpe
    10·1 answer
  • Is water wet?<br> I need an argument.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!