Answer:
The answer should be C. slanted upward to the right.
Hope this helps. :-)
La longitud <em>final</em> del puente de acero es 100.018 metros.
Asumamos que la dilatación <em>térmica</em> experimentada por el puente de acero es <em>pequeña</em>, de modo que podemos emplear la siguiente aproximación <em>lineal</em> para determinar la longitud <em>final</em> del puente de acero (
), en metros:
![L = L_{o}\cdot [1+\alpha\cdot (T_{f}-T_{o})]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=L%20%3D%20L_%7Bo%7D%5Ccdot%20%5B1%2B%5Calpha%5Ccdot%20%28T_%7Bf%7D-T_%7Bo%7D%29%5D)
(1)
Donde:
- Longitud inicial del puente, en metros. 
- Coeficiente de dilatación, sin unidad.
- Temperatura inicial, en grados Celsius.
- Temperatura final, en grados Celsius.
Si tenemos que 
, 
, 
y 
, entonces la longitud final del puente de acero es:
![L = (100\,m)\cdot [1+(11.5\times 10^{-6})\cdot (24\,^{\circ}C - 8\,^{\circ}C)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=L%20%3D%20%28100%5C%2Cm%29%5Ccdot%20%5B1%2B%2811.5%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-6%7D%29%5Ccdot%20%2824%5C%2C%5E%7B%5Ccirc%7DC%20-%208%5C%2C%5E%7B%5Ccirc%7DC%29%5D)
La longitud <em>final</em> del puente de acero es 100.018 metros.
Para aprender más sobre dilatación térmica, invitamos cordialmente a ver esta pregunta verificada: brainly.com/question/24953416
This study was aimed at testing the construct validity of the basketball basic motion skills test instrument (ITK GDBB). The research used descriptive method of 3 basketball experts in the city of Cimahi; 3 experts are the expert in basketball. The instrument used was the ITB GDBB developed by Silvy (2019) consisting of top passing, bottom passing, top service, bottom service, chest passing, bounding passing, overhead passing, and leading ball (dribbling). This instrument consists of 76 items that cover 4 domains in basketball, namely chest pass, overhead pass, bound pass, and dribbling. The validity method used the construct validity of different power types. For the reliability method, it used the Kuder Ricardson (KR) and Objectivity analysis. The results of the construct validity analysis of a total of 76 items show that the score is ranged from 0.67 to 1.00. The construct validity value of 71 items in the basketball game is in the high category (= 1.00), 5 items are in the sufficient category, the relativity score is ranged from 0.75 to 0.98, and the objectivity score is ranged from 0.89 to 0.95. The conclusion is that this test instrument can be used as a standardized basic motion skill test for standardized large ball games for validity in basic motion skills in basketball games for grade VII junior high school students.
It would be c repeated processes-that are used in a variety of ways
