Answer:
The amount of heat transfer is 21,000J .
Explanation:
The equation form of thermodynamics is,
ΔQ=ΔU+W
Here, ΔQ is the heat transferred, ΔU is the change in internal energy, and W is the work done.
Substitute 0 J for W and 0 J for ΔU
ΔQ = 0J+0J
ΔQ = 0J
The change in internal energy is equal to zero because the temperature changes of the house didn’t change. The work done is zero because the volume did not change
The heat transfer is,
ΔQ=Q (in
) −Q (out
)
Substitute 19000 J + 2000 J for Q(in) and 0 J for Q(out)
ΔQ=(19000J+2000J)−(0J)
=21,000J
Thus, the amount of heat transfer is 21,000J .
Answer:
because it affects the attom in living things
That statement is true
Retinal disparity : space between your eyes that allow binocular vision to create depth perception
Retinal Convergence : Space between your eyes that signal visual moves to the retina
They both will increases as an object get closer to the individual, allowing them acknowledge and observe the existence of the object
Answer:
its constant i think
Explanation:
or its stable dunno which term will they be using
Answer:
The first law, also called the law of inertia, was pioneered by Galileo. This was quite a conceptual leap because it was not possible in Galileo's time to observe a moving object without at least some frictional forces dragging against the motion. In fact, for over a thousand years before Galileo, educated individuals believed Aristotle's formulation that, wherever there is motion, there is an external force producing that motion.
The second law, $ f(t)=m\,a(t)$ , actually implies the first law, since when $ f(t)=0$ (no applied force), the acceleration $ a(t)$ is zero, implying a constant velocity $ v(t)$ . (The velocity is simply the integral with respect to time of $ a(t)={\dot v}(t)$ .)
Newton's third law implies conservation of momentum [138]. It can also be seen as following from the second law: When one object ``pushes'' a second object at some (massless) point of contact using an applied force, there must be an equal and opposite force from the second object that cancels the applied force. Otherwise, there would be a nonzero net force on a massless point which, by the second law, would accelerate the point of contact by an infinite amount.
Explanation:
