Which is not a way to conserve existing energy resources?

2 answers:

8 0

For the answer to the question above, the answer is simple.<span> among</span> the choices given the only way on not to conserve energy is by using the available fossil fuel.
I hope my answer helped you. feel free to ask more questions. Have a nice day!

Ghella [55]2 years ago

5 0

Use available fossil fuel

You might be interested in

A comet is cruising through the solar system at a speed of 50,000 kilometers per hour foe 4 hours time. What is the total distan

Triss [41]

Answer:

<em>The distance covered by comet is </em> $200,000 km$

Explanation:

Speed is defined as the rate of change of distance with time. It is given by the equation speed= $\bold{\frac{distance}{time}}$

Thus distance= $speed*time$

In this problem it is given that speed of comet= $\frac{50,000km}{hr}$

time travelled by the comet= 4 hours

Thus distance= $speed*time$

= $500000*4$

= $\bold{200,000km}$

5 0

2 years ago

In midair an M = 145 kg bomb explodes into two pieces of m1 = 115 kg and another, respectively. Before the explosion, the bomb w

Daniel [21]

Answer:

$v_2=-133.17m/s$ , the minus meaning west.

Explanation:

We know that linear momentum must be conserved, so it will be the same before ( $p_i$ ) and after ( $p_f$ ) the explosion. We will take the east direction as positive.

Before the explosion we have $p_i=m_iv_i=Mv_i$ .

After the explosion we have pieces 1 and 2, so $p_f=m_1v_1+m_2v_2$ .

These equations must be vectorial but since we look at the instants before and after the explosions and the bomb fragments in only 2 pieces the problem can be simplified in one dimension with direction east-west.

Since we know momentum must be conserved we have:

$Mv_i=m_1v_1+m_2v_2$