Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3/8 is closest to 1/2 yw btw
Answer: 2/3 * (× + 2 )
Step-by-step explanation:
((x²-4)/(3x)) ÷ ((x-2)/(2x)). ⇒ [ ( ײ - 4 ) * 2x ] ÷ [ ( × - 2 ) *3x ]
Simplifying by x [ 2 * ( ײ - 4 ) ] ÷ [ ( × - 2 ) *3 ] ⇒ (2/3)*{ [ ( x-2 )*(×+2)]÷ (×-2) }
Simplifying by ( ×+2) 2/3 * (× + 2 )
You find a common denominator (the bottom one) and then add the numerator (the top) but you don't add the denominator, you just make it the same
Answer:
Yes, it passes the vertical line test
Step-by-step explanation:
This graph has a one to one correspondence and will pass the vertical line test, there fore it is a function
M + s = 10 or s = 10 - m
<span>3m + 2s = 23 </span>
<span>substitute first equation into second equation: </span>
<span>3m + 2(10 - m) = 23 </span>
<span>3m + 20 - 2m = 23 </span>
<span>m = 3 </span>
<span>using first equation: </span>
<span>s = 10 - 3 = 7 </span>
<span>check using second equation: </span>
<span>3(3) + 2(7) = 23 </span>
<span>9 + 14 = 23 checks </span>
<span>He hit 7 stationary and 3 moving targets.</span>
