1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fgiga [73]
3 years ago
8

(25 pts) Estimate how much collector area and storage capacity would be required for an active solar hot-water system designed t

o supply the total needs for two four-person families, one living in Manchester, New Hampshire, where the latitude is 44+o north and the other in Albuquerque, New Mexico, at 35+o North. The heat capacity of water is about 4200 J/kgoC and the hot water supply temperature in both houses is 60oC (140oF). State and justify all additional assumptions made.
Physics
1 answer:
Aneli [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The required  total area is 1.48 m²

Explanation:

Given that,

Latitude = 44+° N

New Mexico,

Latitude= 35+° N

Heat capacity = 4200 J/Kg°C

Temperature = 60°C

Let us assume the input temperature 22°C

Estimate volume of water 100 ltr for 4 person.

We need to calculate the heat

Using formula of heat

H=mc_{p}\Delta T

H=mc_{p}(T_{f}-T_{i})

Put the value into the formula

H=100\times4200\times(60-22)

H=15960\ KJ...(I)

Let solar radiation for 6 hours/day.

We need to calculate the total energy per unit area

Using formula of energy

E=1000\times6\times3600\ J/m^2

E=21600\ KJ/m^2

Let the efficiency of collector is 50 %

Then,  the total energy per unit area will be

E=21600\times\dfrac{50}{100}

E=10800\ KJ/m^2....(II)

We need to calculate the required total area

Using equation (I) and (II)

A=\dfrac{H}{E}

Where, H = heat

E = total energy

Put the value into the formula

A=\dfrac{15960}{10800}

A=1.48\ m^2

Hence, The required  total area is 1.48 m²

You might be interested in
The elements least likely to form bonds are found in what group
klasskru [66]
It is in the noble gas group which has a full valence electron shell found in group 18 
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A contestant in a winter games event pulls a 36.0 kg block of ice across a frozen lake with a rope over his shoulder as shown in
Novay_Z [31]

(a) The minimum force F he must exert to get the block moving is 38.9 N.

(b) The acceleration of the block is 0.79 m/s².

<h3>Minimum force to be applied </h3>

The minimum force F he must exert to get the block moving is calculated as follows;

Fcosθ = μ(s)Fₙ

Fcosθ = μ(s)mg

where;

  • μ(s) is coefficient of static friction
  • m is mass of the block
  • g is acceleration due to gravity

F = [0.1(36)(9.8)] / [(cos(25)]

F = 38.9 N

<h3>Acceleration of the block</h3>

F(net) = 38.9 - (0.03 x 36 x 9.8) = 28.32

a = F(net)/m

a = 28.32/36

a = 0.79 m/s²

Thus, the minimum force F he must exert to get the block moving is 38.9 N.

The acceleration of the block is 0.79 m/s².

Learn more about minimum force here: brainly.com/question/14353320

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
A light ray incident on a block of glass makes an incident angle of 50.0° with the normal to the surface. The refracted ray in t
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

The index of refraction of the glass is 1.3

Explanation:

Given data:

i = incident angle = 50°

r = refracted angle = 36.1°

The index of refraction according Snell´s law is:

n=\frac{1*sini}{sinr} =\frac{1*sin50}{sin36.1} =1.3

4 0
3 years ago
Does the theory of relativity show that Newtonian mechanics is wrong?
valina [46]

Answer:

Einstein extended the rules of Newton for high speeds. For applications of mechanics at low speeds, Newtonian ideas are almost equal to reality. That is the reason we use Newtonian mechanics in practice at low speeds.

Explanation:

<em>But on a conceptual level, Einstein did prove Newtonian ideas quite wrong in some cases, e.g. the relativity of simultaneity. But again, in calculations, Newtonian ideas give pretty close to correct answer in low-speed regimes. So, the numerical validity of Newtonian laws in those regimes is something that no one can ever prove completely wrong - because they have been proven correct experimentally to a good approximation.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
What is potential energy​
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

An Energy held by an object because of its position relative by other objects

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You are 9.0 m from the door of your bus, behind the bus, when it pulls away with an acceleration of 1.0 m/s2. You instantly star
    8·1 answer
  • Need help ???? Only answer if you think you know it
    13·1 answer
  • Why is it that the farther away from earth you go the bigger the planets get?
    8·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS!!!! question 4 a, c, g, h from the sheet please answer as fully as possible
    13·1 answer
  • 1 km = 100 m. how many meters are in 2500 km?
    5·2 answers
  • _____cells do not contain a nucleus
    6·1 answer
  • QUESTION 6
    10·2 answers
  • Two tiny conducting spheres are identical and carry charges of -22.0 µC and +46.0 µC. They are separated by a distance of 2.47 c
    5·1 answer
  • A steel cable of diameter 3.0 cm supports a load of 2.0kN. What is the fractional length increase of the cable compared with the
    11·1 answer
  • Calculate the magnetic field and its direction at point P, which is 2.0 cm away from the top wire and 4.0 cm from the bottom wir
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!