False, It's legal in some but not all states.
<span>The answer is an empirical approach
Empirical approach is a problem solving approach which emphasizes that experiments performed on a theory should provide data that is observable and verifiable to prove the correctness of a theory. It is like approaching problem realistically rather than being based on scientific theory and believing the observed results.</span>
Answer: judicial restraint
Explanation:
Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional, though what counts as obviously unconstitutional is itself a matter of some debate. Judicial restraint is sometimes regarded as the opposite of judicial activism. In deciding questions of constitutional law, judicially restrained jurists go to great lengths to defer to the legislature. Judicially restrained judges respect stare decisis, the principle of upholding established precedent handed down by past judges
All natural radiation is at a level low enough to be safe
I'm pretty sure it's A. hydrosphere, because hydro means water
hope this helps:)
