Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
An event driven programs are process of programming by which an algorithm is written by programming on a UI element, placing an event listener such that it handled when triggered by calling a call-back function.
E.g is a click event on a button which is a UI element. An event listener example, mouse down can placed on it, and if a user mouse down on it, it is handled by calling a call-back function which might be to open a new page on website.
The answer is the range. The outliner is anything that “lies outside.” Range is the highest#-lowest#. So 78-28 = 50, which is not close the numbers that occurred most often (in this case, the #s in the 30s).
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Since y will have same value, y doesn't really matter. Thus,
We can solve for y in the 2nd equation as:
-3x - y = 4
-3x - 4 = y
Now we can plug it into the first and solve for x:
-9x + 4y = 8
-9x + 4(-3x - 4) = 8
-9x - 12x - 16 = 8
-21x = 8 + 16
-21x = 24
x = 24/-21
x = -8/7
Correct answer is C.
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.