Represent you in court and advise you on what plee deals and other actions you should take
Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:
4. Germany to focus its efforts on the Western Front.
Explanation:
Germany, on the end of the eastern front, was able to refocus all resources in crushing the western front and capturing Paris. However, they failed due to the inclusion of the US into the war, which poured hundreds of thousands of soldiers in defending France, effectively defeating the original plan of Germany, and ended with the defeat of the Central Powers.
~
Answer:1350$
Explanation:
The amount you owe in Income taxes is $1,350.
What action did the United States take in 2003 as part of its "War on Terror"? It killed al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden after he fled to Pakistan. It entered Afghanistan and removed the Taliban from power. It invaded Iraq and removed dictator Saddam Hussein from power. (Hope this helps )
