Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer:
First one is not possible
Second one is possible, and would be an isocèles triangle
Third one is possible, would be scalene
Last one is not possible
Comment any further questions :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Arc CDE and arc EAC.
Step-by-step explanation:
Semicircles are exactly one-half of a circle and are always equal to 180 degrees. Since line CE is a horizontal line, measuring 180 degrees, 2 semicircles can be arcs CDE and EAC because they equal half of the circle.
I hope this helps!
what would you like me to do with these numbers????
answers
6n² - n - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
2n x 3n +2n - 3n - 1
