1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
6

The shape of the nucleus is maintained by

Chemistry
1 answer:
dexar [7]3 years ago
8 0
B. the necular lamina
You might be interested in
What is the predicted change in the boiling point of water when 1.50 g of
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

0.00735°C

Explanation:

By seeing the question, we can see the elevation in boiling point with addition of BaCl₂ in water

⠀

\textsf {While} \:  \sf  {\Delta T_b}  \: \textsf{expression is used} \\  \textsf {for elevation of boiling point}

⠀

⠀

<u>The</u><u> </u><u>elevation</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>boiling</u><u> </u><u>point</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>phenomenon</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>which</u><u> </u><u>there</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>increase</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>boiling</u><u> </u><u>point</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>solution</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>when</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>particular</u><u> </u><u>type</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>solute</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>added</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>pure</u><u> </u><u>solvent</u><u>.</u>

⠀

⠀

\sf  \large \underline{The \:  formula \: to \:  be  \: used \:  in \:  this \:  question \:  is}  \\   \boxed{T_b = i \times  K_b \times  m}

⠀

⠀

Where 'i' is van't hoff factor which represents the ratio of observed osmotic pressure and the value to be expected.

and 'i' is 3 (as given in the question)

⠀

'Kb' is molal boiling point constant. And it's value is 0.51°C/mol(given in question)

⠀

'm' represent the molality of solution. Molatity is no. of moles of solution present in 1kg of solution.

⠀

⠀

<u>To</u><u> </u><u>find</u><u> </u><u>molality</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>we</u><u> </u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>divide</u><u> </u><u>no</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>moles</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>solute</u><u> </u><u>by</u><u> </u><u>weight</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>solution</u>

⠀

While first we need to no. of moles

\sf \implies no. \: of \: moles =  \frac{weight \: of \: solute}{molar \: mass \: of \: solute}  \\  \\ \implies \sf no. \: of \: moles =  \frac{1.5}{208.23}  \\  \\  \sf \implies  no. \: of \: moles = 0.0072

⠀

⠀

<u>Now</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>we</u><u> </u><u>will</u><u> </u><u>find</u><u> </u><u>molality</u>

⠀

\sf  \hookrightarrow molality =  \frac{no.\: of \: moles}{weight \: of \: solution}  \\  \\  \sf  \hookrightarrow molality =  \frac{0.072}{1.5}  \\  \\  \sf  \hookrightarrow molality = 0.048 \: mol {kg}^{ - 1}

⠀

⠀

\textsf{ \large{ \underline{Now substituting the required values}}}

⠀

\sf \longmapsto \Delta T_b = 3  \times 0.51  \times 0.0048 \\  \\ \\     \boxed{ \tt{ \longmapsto \Delta T_b =0.00735{ \degree}C}}

⠀

⠀

⠀

<u>Henceforth</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>change</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>boiling</u><u> </u><u>point</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>0</u><u>.</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u>7</u><u>3</u><u>5</u><u>°</u><u>C</u><u>.</u>

7 0
2 years ago
Plz download the doc and answer its due in 20 mins like bro wth
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

and how do we know this is not a virus

Explanation:

sorry dude im just saying

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which formula is an empirical formula?
poizon [28]
<h2>Hello!</h2>

The answer is:

The empirical formula is the option B. NH_{3}

<h2>Why?</h2>

The empirical formula of a compound is the simplest formula that can be written. On the opposite, the molecular formula involves a variant of the same compound, but it can be also simplified to an empirical formula.

MolecularFormula=n(EmpiricalFormula)

We are looking for a formula that cannot be simplified by dividing the number of molecules/atoms that conforms the compound.

Let's discard option by option in order to find which formula is an empirical formula (cannot be simplified)

A. N_{2}O_{4}

It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

N_{2}O_{4}=2(NO_{2})

B. NH_{3}

It's an empirical formula since it cannot be obtained by the multiplication of a whole number and the simplest formula. It's the simplest formula that we can find of the compound.

C. C_{3}H_{6}

It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

C_{3}H_{6}=3(CH_{2})

D. P_{4}O_{10}

It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

P_{4}O_{10}=2(P_{2}O_{5})

Hence, the empirical formula is the option B. NH_{3}

Have a nice day!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For each element, predict where the "jump " occurs for successive ionization energies. (For example, does the jump occur between
vichka [17]

Answer:

A jump occurs when a core electron is removed.

Explanation:

A jump in ionization energy occurs when a core electron is removed. A large jump in the ionization energy easily be seen from the electronic configuration of an element.

For Beryllium, the electronic configuration of is 1s2 2s2.

There are two valence electrons in the outermost shell hence the ionization energy data for beryllium will show a sudden jump or increase in going from the second to the third ionization energy owing to the removal of a core electron

The electronic configuration for Nitrogen is 1s2 2s2 2p3. Five valence electrons are found in the outermost shell so the ionization energy data for nitrogen will show a sudden jump or increase in going from the fifth to sixth ionization energy because of the removal of a core electron

The electronic configuration of oxygen is 1s2 2s2 2p4. There are six valence electrons hence ionization energy for oxygen atom will show a sudden jump or increase in going from the sixth to the seventh ionization energy because of the removal of a core electron

The electronic configuration of Lithium is 1s2 2s1

There is one valence electron in its outermost shell so its ionization energy data will show a sudden jump or increase in going from the first to the second ionization energy because of the removal of a core electron.

8 0
4 years ago
A solution at 25 degrees Celsius is 1.0 × 10–5 M H3O+. What is the concentration of OH– in this solution? 1.0 × 10–5 M OH– 1.0 ×
Triss [41]

Answer:

1.0 × 10⁻⁹ M.

Explanation:

<em>∵ [H₃O⁺][OH⁻] = 10⁻¹⁴.</em>

[H₃O⁺] = 1.0 x 10⁻⁵ M.

<em>∴ [OH⁻] = 10⁻¹⁴/[H₃O⁺]</em> = 10⁻¹⁴/(1.0 x 10⁻⁵ M) = <em>1.0 × 10⁻⁹ M.</em>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A sealed 1.0 l flask is charged with 0.500 mol of i2 and 0.500 mol of br2. an equilibrium reaction ensues: i2 (g) br2 (g) 2ibr (
    5·1 answer
  • In one compound of lead and sulfur, there are 6.46 g of lead
    13·1 answer
  • What chemical is PCL3
    15·2 answers
  • A certain element has two naturally occurring isotopes. The atomic mass of isotope 1 (35.4723 % natural abundance) is 184.9529 a
    14·1 answer
  • Help me!!!! Please!!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • 18) Mg and S would be expected to react in a ratio of: <br> (1:1, 2:1, 1:2 or 2:3)
    5·1 answer
  • Help me solve this question​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the acceleration of a car that starts at 0 km/s and speeds up to 50 km/s in 10 seconds?
    5·1 answer
  • Which option is a key point of cell theory? Cells can repair neighboring cells, but not themselves.Cells can repair neighboring
    14·1 answer
  • Why is it hotter in the summer and colder in the winter?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!