1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
2 years ago
9

A 1,000 kg car has 50,000 joules of kinetic energy what is its speed??

Physics
2 answers:
Vaselesa [24]2 years ago
3 0
Using KE=1/2mv^2

v=\sqrt{50000/500

so v=10
nydimaria [60]2 years ago
3 0

½mv²= KE  

½(1000)?²= 50000

500*?²= 50000

/500            /500

? ²=100

Square root  

?= 10

10 m/s is you answer

You might be interested in
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

  (E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible

Explanation:

The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).

None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.

6 0
3 years ago
f your risk-aversion coefficient is A = 4 and you believe that the entire 1926–2015 period is representative of future expected
siniylev [52]

Answer:

The portfolio should invest 48.94% in equity while 51.05% in the T-bills.

Explanation:

As the complete question is not given here ,the table of data is missing which is as attached herewith.

From the maximized equation of the utility function it is evident that

Weight=\frac{E_M-r_f}{A\sigma_M^2}

For the equity, here as

  • Weight is percentage of the equity which is to be calculated
  • {E_M-r_f} is the Risk premium whose value as seen from the attached data for the period 1926-2015 is 8.30%
  • A is the risk aversion factor which is given as 4.
  • \sigma_M is the standard deviation of the portfolio which from the data for the period 1926-2015 is 20.59

By substituting values.

Weight=\frac{E_M-r_f}{A\sigma_M^2}\\Weight=\frac{8.30\%}{4(20.59\%)^2}\\Weight=0.4894 =48.94\%

So the weight of equity is 48.94%.

Now the weight of T bills is given as

Weight_{T-Bills}=1-Weight_{equity}\\Weight_{T-Bills}=1-0.4894\\Weight_{T-Bills}=0.5105=51.05\%\\

So  the weight of T-bills is 51.05%.

The portfolio should invest 48.94% in equity while 51.05% in the T-bills.

7 0
2 years ago
Which best describes why Keplers observation of planetary motion is a law instead of a theory
svet-max [94.6K]

Kepler's first law - sometimes referred to as the law of ellipses - explains that planets are orbiting the sun in a path described as an ellipse. An ellipse can easily be constructed using a pencil, two tacks, a string, a sheet of paper and a piece of cardboard. Tack the sheet of paper to the cardboard using the two tacks. Then tie the string into a loop and wrap the loop around the two tacks. Take your pencil and pull the string until the pencil and two tacks make a triangle (see diagram at the right). Then begin to trace out a path with the pencil, keeping the string wrapped tightly around the tacks. The resulting shape will be an ellipse. An ellipse is a special curve in which the sum of the distances from every point on the curve to two other points is a constant. The two other points (represented here by the tack locations) are known as the foci of the ellipse. The closer together that these points are, the more closely that the ellipse resembles the shape of a circle. In fact, a circle is the special case of an ellipse in which the two foci are at the same location. Kepler's first law is rather simple - all planets orbit the sun in a path that resembles an ellipse, with the sun being located at one of the foci of that ellipse.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are such scientific advances still valuable?
Sergeu [11.5K]
Because the more advances made in the world means the more we can learn on how things work and how we can better the lives of humans and other species. If we didn't have scientific advancements we wouldn't have cell phones, electric, tv, car, computers, ect. We would still be living in Cave man era with clubs and horrible language skills.
4 0
3 years ago
Are the items in the list renewable or nonrenewable resources?
Elza [17]
N
R
R
R
N
Hope this helps.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happens to the electronegativity of elements as you move from bottom left to upper right across the periodic table?
    13·1 answer
  • two thermometers, calibrated in celsius and fahrenheit respectively, are put into a liquid. the reading on the fahrenheit scale
    10·1 answer
  • HELP! Ammeters are placed on each branch of a parallel circuit. How will their readings compare?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain how to measure volume using a graduated cylinder
    11·1 answer
  • a 45kg box of books is lifted o a bookself 1.75 m above the floor. how much work was done to lift the books?
    9·1 answer
  • An object is weighed at different locations on the
    11·2 answers
  • Please help!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • How do you measure the wavelength of a wave?
    8·2 answers
  • What kind of charge does an object have if it has extra positive charges
    10·1 answer
  • Kwanzaa farts apple juice
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!