Hello there.
<span>In the context of depth perception, which of the following is a monocular cue?
</span><span>(C) Convergence
</span>
Answer:

& 
Explanation:
Given:
- interior temperature of box,

- height of the walls of box,

- thickness of each layer of bi-layered plywood,

- thermal conductivity of plywood,

- thickness of sandwiched Styrofoam,

- thermal conductivity of Styrofoam,

- exterior temperature,

<u>From the Fourier's law of conduction:</u>

....................................(1)
<u>Now calculating the equivalent thermal resistance for conductivity using electrical analogy:</u>




.....................(2)
Putting the value from (2) into (1):


is the heat per unit area of the wall.
The heat flux remains constant because the area is constant.
<u>For plywood-Styrofoam interface from inside:</u>



&<u>For Styrofoam-plywood interface from inside:</u>



Answer:
The ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must first start by doing a drawing that will represent the situation. (See picture attached).
We can see in the picture that the least the angle the farther the ball will go. So we need to find the A and B position to determine how farther the second shot would go. Let's start with point A.
So, first we need to determine the components of the velocity of the ball, like this:






we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.317s for the ball to hit on point A.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point A with this time. We can find it like this:



Once we found the distance between the net and point A, we can similarly find the distance between the net and point B:







t= -0.9159s or t=0.468s
we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.468s for the ball to hit on point B.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point B with this time. We can find it like this:



So once we got the two distances we can now find the difference between them:

so the ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.
Answer:
omg i'm so sorry, i hope you get better <3!
Explanation: