Answer:
250 mL (total solution) = 104 mL (stock solution) + 146 mL (water)
Explanation:
Data Given
M1 = 6.00 M
M2 = 2.5 M
V1 = 250 mL
V2 = ?
Solution:
As the chemist needs to prepare 250 mL of solution from 6.00 M ammonium hydroxide solution to prepare a 2.50 M aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide.
Now
first he have to determine the amount of ammonium hydroxide solution that will be taken from6.00 M ammonium hydroxide solution
For this Purpose we use the following formula
M1V1=M2V2
Put values from given data in the formula
6 x V1 = 2.5 x 250
Rearrange the equation
V1 = 2.5 x 250 /6
V1 = 104 mL
So 104 mL is the volume of the solution which we have to take from the 6.00 M ammonium hydroxide solution to prepare 2.5 M aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide
But we have to prepare 250 mL of the solution.
so the chemist will take 104 mL from 6.00 M ammonium hydroxide solution and have to add 146 mL water to make 250 mL of new solution.
in this question you have to tell about the amount of water that is 146 mL
250 mL (total solution) = 104 mL (stock solution) + 146 mL (water)
A hypothesis is given to explain a phenomena which has not been
explained till then.
it can be supported by an experiment if that experiment gets the other
results regarding that particular phenomena in agreement with that being
predicted by the hypothesis
Answer:
Molecule.
Explanation:
carbon and fluorine. Based on the bonding, a unit of carbon dioxideis described as a molecule.
The location of the negative charges is evenly distributed throughout the entire atom.
J. J. Tomson concluded that atoms are divisible and that the corpuscles are their building blocks.
Atoms are made up of smaller particles.
J. J. Thomson discovered the electron ( the negative charges of the atom) in 1897.
His "plum pudding" model (1904) suggested: the electrons are embedded in the positive charge and evenly distributed throughout the entire atom.
With this model, he abandoned his earlier hypothesis that the atom was composed of immaterial vortices.
Later, Rutherford demonstrate that J.J Thompson's Plum Pudding model was not accurate.
More info about Thomson’s plum pudding model: brainly.com/question/6319700
#SPJ4
Dios mío, vaya, eso es una locura, no lo sabía, pero gracias por la información. :)
