1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kakasveta [241]
3 years ago
13

A wave oscillates 50 times per second. What is its frequency?

Physics
2 answers:
LenKa [72]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Frequency of the wave is f = 50 Hz

Explanation:

It is given that, a wave oscillates 50 times per second. The number of oscillations per second is called frequency of a wave. Mathematically, it can be written as:

frequency=no\ of\ oscillations

Here, number of oscillations, n = 50

So, frequency of this wave is equivalent to 50 Hz. It is equal to number of cycles per second.

So, the correct option is (b). Hence, this is the required solution.

Advocard [28]3 years ago
6 0

"per second" is exactly the definition of "Hertz".

50 per second is 50 Hz. (B)

You might be interested in
A uniform meter rule with a mass of 200g is suspended at zero mark pivotes at 22.0cm mark. calculate the mass of the rule.
denpristay [2]

Answer:

The mass of the rule is 56.41 g  

Explanation:

Given;

mass of the object suspended at zero mark, m₁ = 200 g

pivot of the uniform meter rule = 22 cm

Total length of meter rule = 100 cm

0                          22cm                                  100cm

-------------------------Δ------------------------------------

↓                                                                       ↓

200g                                                                 m₂  

Apply principle of moment

(200 g)(22 cm - 0)     = m₂(100 cm - 22 cm)

(200 g)(22 cm) = m₂(78 cm)

m₂ =  (200 g)(22 cm)  / (78 cm)

m₂ = 56.41 g  

Therefore,  the mass of the rule is 56.41 g                                            

3 0
4 years ago
The photoelectric effect tells us that __________.
Ivanshal [37]
<h2>hey </h2>

  1. It describes the process by which surface electron's are emitted from a metal when light is shined on it.
  2. And it tells us that light at a higher intensity must contain more quanta of energy, known as protons.

6 0
3 years ago
Two objects collide and bounce apart. Assuming no outside forces act on the system, which best describes the total momentum afte
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

It is always the same as it was before the collision.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help on this one?
Nadya [2.5K]
I suppose the answer would be C. Kepler's three laws talk about planetary orbit.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think that astronomers mean when they use the term observable universe? (Hint: Think of the time it takes for light
Kryger [21]

What does "observable universe" mean?

Light does not travel instantaneously between points in space. It has a finite speed "c", measured experimentally to be about 3 x 108 meters/second (or about 1.1 x 109 kilometers/hour. Flying at this rate you could get from NYC to Tokyo in about 1/30th of a second.)

Since light takes time to travel, we never actually see the current moment. Looking down at your hand, you do not see it as it is right now, but rather as it was a miniscule fraction of a moment earlier. Now, this interval is so small, given the short distance between your retina and your hand, that the difference is utterly negligible. In fact, bound by Earth's meager scope, the phenomenon isn't really worth mentioning.

The discrepancy becomes significant, however, when exploring much larger distances. Light years, for example. A light year is the distance light travels in one year. If you look at a star that's 50 light years away, you are seeing it as it was 50 years ago. Thus the deeper you peer into space, the farther you are seeing back in time. If this star had exploded 49 years ago, in a spectacular event called a Supernova, we would not know it until 1 more year from now.

Likewise, any event that happened beyond a certain point in the past is unknowable to us if the signal from it hasn't had time to reach us. It is not that our telescopes are too weak, or our instrumentation insensitive. We simply do not yet have access to the information. (No matter how prolific a reader you may be, you'd be hard pressed to read a friend's email if it has yet to arrive in your inbox.)

As a consequence of this limitation, astronomers often refer to the observable universe, a term referring to the volume of space that we are physically able to detect. The question of what lies outside this observable region is a tempting one to ponder. Yet inspiring though it may be, there is a certain futility in such a pursuit.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two charged particles are placed 2.0 meters apart. The first charge is +2.0 E-6 C, and the second charge is +4.0 E-6 C. What is
    8·1 answer
  • A non-reflective coating that has a thickness of 198 nm (n = 1.45) is deposited on top of a substrate of glass (n = 1.50). What
    14·1 answer
  • Oxygen is a reactant in a combination reaction, which always produces energy in the form of heat and light. A. True B. False
    6·2 answers
  • One way to cool a gas is to let it expand. When a certain gas under a pressure of 5.00 x 10^6 Pa at 25.°C is allowed to expand t
    8·1 answer
  • Anybody knows the answers?
    13·2 answers
  • When are you most aware of your motion in a moving vehicle: when it is moving steadily in a straight line or when it is accelera
    11·1 answer
  • Help please! thank you! please dont plagiarism my teacher checks for plagiarism ;-;
    6·1 answer
  • A meteor which is moving at a speed of 100 m si
    13·1 answer
  • How much heat does it take to raise a<br> cup of water (2.34 x 10-4 m3) from<br> 15.0 °C to 75.0 °C?
    11·1 answer
  • We never see a crescent jupiter from earth because jupiter __________.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!