All categories

2 years ago

Given a force of 88n and an acceleration of 4m/s2 what is the mass?

Physics

2 answers:

Hitman42 [59]2 years ago

5 0

F=ma
m=F/a = 88/4 = 22 kg

Leni [432]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Mass, m = 22 kg

Explanation:

It is given that,

Force, F = 88 N

Acceleration, $a=4\ m/s^2$

We need to find its mass. It can be calculated using the formula of force as per second law of Newton i.e.

F = m a

$m=\dfrac{F}{a}$

$m=\dfrac{88\ N}{4\ m/s^2}$

m = 22 kg

So, the mass of the object is 22 kg. Hence, this is the required solution.

You might be interested in

The length of a rectangle is increasing at a rate of 4 cm/s and its width is increasing at a rate of 6 cm/s. When the length is

Fudgin [204]

Answer:

24cm/s

Explanation:

A=L*w

A'=L'*w'

L=13

w=5

L'=4

w'=6

A=?

A'=?

A=L*w

A=13*5

A=65

A'=L'*w'

A'=4*6

A'=24

*the given lengths are just to throw you off*

3 0

2 years ago

8. A turtle crawls along a straight line, which we will call the x-axis with the positive direction to the right. The equation f

pychu [463]

(a) The turtle's initial velocity is 4 m/s, initial position of the turtle is 5 cm, and initial acceleration is -1.25 m/s².

(b) The time when the velocity of the turtle is zero is 3.2 s.

(d) The time taken for the turtle to travel 30 cm is 0.08 s.

<h3>Initial velocity of the turtle</h3>

The initial velocity of the turtle is calculated as follows;

$v = \frac{dx}{dt} \\\\x = 5 + 4t -0.625t^2\\\\v(t) = 4 - 1.25t\\\\v(0) = 4-0\\\\v(0) = 4 \ m/s$

<h3>Initial acceleration of the turtle</h3>

The initial acceleration of the turtle is calculated as follows;

$a = \frac{dv}{dt} \\\\v(t) = 4 - 1.25t\\\\a = -1.25\ m/s^2$

<h3>Initial position of the turtle</h3>

x(t) = 5 + 4t - 0.625t²

x(0) = 5 cm

<h3>Time when the velocity becomes zero</h3>

v(t) = 4 - 1.25t

0 = 4 - 1.25t

1.25t = 4

t = 4/1.25

t = 3.2 s

<h3>Time taken to return to starting point</h3>

The total distance traveled is calculated as follows

v² = u² + 2ad

0 = (4)² + 2(-1.25)d

0 = 16 - 2.5d

2.5d = 16

d = 16/2.5

d = 6.4 m

Time to travel the given distance;

d = ut + ¹/₂at²

6.4 = (4)t + ¹/₂(-1.25)t²

6.4 = 4t - 0.625t²

0.625t² - 4t + 6.4 = 0

solve the quadratic equation using formula method;

t = 3.2 s

The time travel the distance two times, = 2 x 3.2 s = 6.4 s

<h3>Time taken for the turtle to travel 30 cm</h3>

d = ut + ¹/₂at²

0.3 = (4)t + ¹/₂(-1.25)t²

0.3 = 4t - 0.625t²

0.625t² - 4t + 0.3 = 0

solve the quadratic equation using formula method;

t = 0.08 s

Learn more about velocity here: brainly.com/question/6504879

7 0

1 year ago

Question 7

erastova [34]

gdj dhbdh sbctcrxrxvh7sdchhcsh

4 0

2 years ago

PLZ! PLZ! PLZ! HELP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Scientific Claim Engaging in scientific argument is a critical piece to the applicati

Nastasia [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

1The study of science and engineering should produce a sense of the process of argument necessary for advancing and defending a new idea or an explanation of a phenomenon and the norms for conducting such arguments. In that spirit, students should argue for the explanations they construct, defend their interpretations of the associated data, and advocate for the designs they propose. (NRC Framework, 2012, p. 73)

Argumentation is a process for reaching agreements about explanations and design solutions. In science, reasoning and argument based on evidence are essential in identifying the best explanation for a natural phenomenon. In engineering, reasoning and argument are needed to identify the best solution to a design problem. Student engagement in scientific argumentation is critical if students are to understand the culture in which scientists live, and how to apply science and engineering for the benefit of society. As such, argument is a process based on evidence and reasoning that leads to explanations acceptable by the scientific community and design solutions acceptable by the engineering community.

Argument in science goes beyond reaching agreements in explanations and design solutions. Whether investigating a phenomenon, testing a design, or constructing a model to provide a mechanism for an explanation, students are expected to use argumentation to listen to, compare, and evaluate competing ideas and methods based on their merits. Scientists and engineers engage in argumentation when investigating a phenomenon, testing a design solution, resolving questions about measurements, building data models, and using evidence to evaluate claims.

Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts.

Respectfully provide and receive critiques about one’s explanations, procedures, models and questions by citing relevant evidence and posing and responding to questions that elicit pertinent elaboration and detail.

Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support or refute an explanation or a model for a phenomenon or a solution to a problem.

Make an oral or written argument that supports or refutes the advertised performance of a device, process, or system, based on empirical evidence concerning whether or not the technology meets relevant criteria and constraints.

Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria.

8 0

1 year ago

Which best describes the law of conservation of mass? The coefficients in front of the chemicals in the reactants should be base

likoan [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. when both sides of the reactants and the products are equal

like h+oh ⇒ h20

hydrogen has 2 atoms on both sides and oxygen has one on both sides

2. no they are put to balance the equation

3. nope they are treated equally as all the other states

4. no if u are talking about a formula unit like NaCl for example it is aqueous not each element taken on its own if u are talking about just elements then i said before all states are treated equally

5. yup

6 0

2 years ago