Would it be
(2r-7)*(2r+7)
?
The easiest way is to graph it based upon the slope (m) and y-intercept (b), in the standard slope-intercept form: y = m (x) + b.
The line above intercepts the y-axis at y = -2, which is b. The slope (m) = rise/run = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1 ); so for the point (-4, 2) to (-6, 4) is:
(4-2)/(-6--4) = 2/(-6+4) = 2/-2 = -1.
So one form of the equation would be:
y = -1x - 2
Now the other form of an equation is point-slope: y-k = m (x-h), where the point is at (h, k)
and if we pick -5 for x (bc 5 it listed in 3 of the answers), the y at x=-5 looks like around +3
so we get: y-k = -1 (x--5)...
y-3 = -(x+5)... therefore D) is the correct answer:
Let
x--------> the number of blue beads
y--------> the number of red beads
we know that
-------> equation
------> equation
equate equation and equation
find the value of x
therefore
the answer is
Ivan has
not enough information to solve it as there are two unknowns in one inequality
I think the relationship between the weight of a stack of standard 8.5x11 copier paper vs number of sheets of paper is proportional because :
Let us assume here, in this situation that each page has the same weight so if i want to find the weight of the complete stack, i will multiply the number of sheets of paper by the weight of a single sheet of paper.