1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Liono4ka [1.6K]
3 years ago
11

You're in the middle of moving and need to bring furniture and into your new house. You want to prop the door open, but your dog

ate the doorstopper (and your homework). All you can find is a large brick. If you want to impart the largest torque on the door to keep it open, where should you place the brick?
A) Put the brick as close to the hinges as possible.
B) Put the brick in the middle of the door.
C) Put the brick as far from the hinges as possible.
Physics
1 answer:
Mamont248 [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C) Put the brick as far from the hinges as possible

Explanation:

As torque is the product of the force around the rotation point and the distance to the pivot point, and the mass (force) of the brick stays constant, what we can do to maximize the torque is maximize the distance to the pivot point, aka the hinge. So we should put the brick as far from the hinges as possible.

You might be interested in
Suppose you know only the position of an object at instants A and B. Is more than one displacement possible? Is more than one av
Burka [1]
<span>Is more than one displacement possible?
No, displacement only considers the initial and final position.
Is more than one average velocity possible?
No, the average velocity is defined as displacement per time and since there is only one displacement possible, there is only one average velocity possible as well.
Is more than one average speed possible?
Yes, the average speed considers the total distance traveled and this distance may not be the same as the total displacement.
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Question: Self-test 3.12 Calculate the change in G for ice at -10°C, with density 917 kg mº, when the pressure is increased from
Akimi4 [234]

The change in the Gibb's free energy per mole (G) is 1.96 J.

The given parameters:

  • Density of the ice, ρ = 917 kg/m³
  • Initial pressure, P₁ = 1.0 bar
  • Final pressure, P₂ = 2.0 bar
  • Temperature, T = - 10 C
  • Mass of water = 18 g

The change in the Gibb's free energy per mole (G) is calculated as follows;

\Delta G = V(P_2-P_1) \\\\

where;

V is the volume of the ice

Density = \frac{Mass}{Volume} \\\\Volume = \frac{Mass}{Density} \\\\Volume = \frac{18 \times 10^{-3} \ kg}{917 \ m^3} \\\\Volume = 1.96 \times 10^{-5} \ m^3\\\\Volume = 1.96 \times 10^{-5} \ m^3 \times \frac{1000 \ L}{m^3} \\\\Volume = 0.0196 \ L

Change in pressure;

P_2 - P_1 = 2.0 \ bar \ - \ 1.0 \ bar = 1.0 \ bar = 0.987 \ atm

The change in the Gibb's free energy per mole (G);

\Delta G= V(P_2-P_1)\\\\\Delta G = 0.0196\ L \times 0.987\ atm \\\\\Delta G = 0.0193 \ L.atm\\\\1 \ L.atm = 101.325 \ J\\\\\Delta G =  0.0193 \ L.atm \times \frac{101.325 \ J}{1 \ L.atm} \\\\\Delta G = 1.96 \ J

Thus, the change in the Gibb's free energy per mole (G) is 1.96 J.

Learn more about Gibb's free energy here: brainly.com/question/10012881

3 0
3 years ago
Is it possible to do work on an object without changing the kinetic energy of the object? Now Why?
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

(a) Yes, it is possible by raising the object to a greater height without acceleration.

Explanation:

The work-energy theorem states that work done on an object is equal to the change in kinetic energy, and change in  kinetic energy requires a change in velocity.

If kinetic energy will not change, then velocity will not change, this means that there will be constant velocity and an object with a constant velocity is not accelerating.

If the object is not accelerating (without acceleration) and it remains at the same height (change in height = 0, and mgh = 0).

Thus, for work to be done on the object, without changing the kinetic energy of the object, the object must be raised  to a greater height without acceleration.

Correct option is " (a) Yes, it is possible by raising the object to a greater height without acceleration".

8 0
3 years ago
What is the velocity of the rock after 3.00 seconds (the rock is falling from a cliff)
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

29.4 m/s

Explanation:

Using the formula: V=Vi + g.t

where V: final velocity, this is  what you want.

Vi: initial velocity, equals to zero as it is falling from rest.

g: acceleration due to gravity = 9.8

t: time, which equals 3 sec.

7 0
3 years ago
Were discovered by James Chadwick and Carl Anderson.
Radda [10]

Answer:

1 is a great answer for this question

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Looking for some help with the left side of the table and the questions followed :)
    12·1 answer
  • Which form of radiation is used to directly INCREASE the temperature of water in a nuclear reactor?
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think a human needs only one egg at a time
    14·1 answer
  • Mr. Stephenson drives his car from Dallas to Town X, a distance of 437 km. The trip takes 7.27 hours. What is the average speed
    6·1 answer
  • The tropic of cancer is to the tropic of capricorn as the arctic circle is to the
    14·1 answer
  • The captain told the passengers that the plane is flying at 450 miles per hour. This information describes the plane's
    12·1 answer
  • Three cars with identical engines and tires start from rest, and accelerate at their maximum rate. Car X is the most massive, an
    8·1 answer
  • ¿Qué características debe tener el movimiento de una persona para que el valor del desplazamiento sea igual al de la distancia r
    7·1 answer
  • Un recipiente contiene 224 dm3 de Ozono de masa 4.561 Kg a 51.09 grados celsius. Calcula la presión del Ozono
    15·1 answer
  • Help please
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!