B (9.81 m/s^2)
Speed no, because acceleration isn't 0
Velocity, pretty much same as speed
Distance no, because it's getting closer
Answer:
There is nothing faster then light
Explanation:
Answer:
Please see below as the answers are self-explanatory.
Explanation:
1) The resultant force is along the line that joins both charges or both masses (assuming both objects can be represented as points)
2) Both type of forces obey Newton's 3rd law.
3) Both are proportional to the product of the property that is affected by the force (charges and masses)
4) Both obey an inverse - square law (consequence of our universe being three-dimensional)
1) Main difference, is that while the gravitational force is always attractive, the electrostatic force can be attractive or repulsive, as there are two types of charges, which attract each other being of different type, and repel each other if they are of the same type.
2) It is possible, artificially, to block the influence of the electrostatic force, shielding a room, for instance, which is not possible for the gravitational force.
Answer:
a) The potential energy in the system is greatest at X.
Explanation:
Let be X the point where a ball rests at the top of a hill. By applying the Principle of Energy Conservation, the total energy in the physical system remains constant and gravitational potential energy at the top of the hill is equal to the sum of kinetic energy, a lower gravitational energy and dissipated work due to nonconservative forces (friction, dragging).

Conclusions are showed as follows:
a) The potential energy in the system is greatest at X.
b) The kinetic energy is the lowest at X and Z.
c) Total energy remains constant as the ball moves from X to Y.
Hence, the correct answer is A.